Search results

When the manufacturers have spend millions of dollars on R&D and recommend agitation patterns, why would anyone with much less experience think that they are better experts and will get better results with stand or semi-stand development? Why not experiment unrolling an exposed film to direct...

The masks are good approximations of the field of view because what one sees can be dependent of the eye location.

All this testing and I am still no closer to the development times at 68 degrees F for Kodak Tmax 3200 and Ilford Delta 3200 both exposed at ISO 3200developed in replenished XTOL.

Welcome to APUG Photrio!!

An approach to photographing sand dunes that is wonderfully unique. Thank you.

I would humbly suggest that the bickerers get a room in a sleazy motel.

Great, you have improvement. So added agitation has eliminated most of the problem.

Welcome to APUG Photrio!!

The distortion is some times tolerated and other times exploited.

Never That was for available light night photography with a tripod.

A zoom lens does not restrict the use of street, portrait, architecture or landscape use. The modern zoom lenses are good enough that very few people could look at a photograph and declare definitively that it was taken by a prime or zoom lens. So Moose22 now wears the ignore hat.

Compensating for flare is a fool's folly since that is an uncontrolled variable. Every lens and every camera configuration with or without lens hoods has different flare characteristics. Just leave flare out and let each user make their adjustments.