Nude - Because descriptive titles offend people.
StoneNYC

Nude - Because descriptive titles offend people.

A recent bedroom nude shoot I did, part of my parts photography collection, someday, a book.
Location
Trumbull, CT, USA
Equipment Used
Mamiya RZ67 Pro II, 90mm, Sekonik 7xxDR Meter, Profoto Pro7B+heads+wafer softboxes
Exposure
1/125 @ f/8 hand held
Film & Developer
Pan F+ & Rodinal 1:50 pushed to 100 or 125 (15 minutes in dev).
Paper & Developer
Epson Scan, only cropping edges in post
Is this print for sale?
  1. Yes
StoneNYC said:
EASmithV said:
gotta love how much attention a photo of a nipple gets vs other images...
I was thinking this would happen, wonder if this means my work is no longer "unremarkable" as one person said, guess all it took was a nipple haha
The nipple had nothing to do with it, on my end; the first look that I had of the image was on my phone, where it was shown at .25" x .375"...and at that size, all you can see is basic composition and tonality. Those two elements are what grabbed my attention, and if you back up and look at the image from really far away you'll see what I mean. When I clicked on it to see what it was at a larger size, my brain said "Oh, it's a nude...huh..." and when the image DIDN'T FALL APART after that revelation, it dawned on me that I was looking at - in my opinion - a rare, well-done nude. I figured that the tones and arrangement were comment-worthy. With all that said, the Nipple Factor (that's a term, now) will get a lot of attention, and we all know why. I'm not arguing this...I'm just saying that it's a nice image (again, opinion) regardless of one's subjective impressions of the content.
 
Sundowner said:
StoneNYC said:
EASmithV said:
gotta love how much attention a photo of a nipple gets vs other images...
I was thinking this would happen, wonder if this means my work is no longer "unremarkable" as one person said, guess all it took was a nipple haha
The nipple had nothing to do with it, on my end; the first look that I had of the image was on my phone, where it was shown at .25" x .375"...and at that size, all you can see is basic composition and tonality. Those two elements are what grabbed my attention, and if you back up and look at the image from really far away you'll see what I mean. When I clicked on it to see what it was at a larger size, my brain said "Oh, it's a nude...huh..." and when the image DIDN'T FALL APART after that revelation, it dawned on me that I was looking at - in my opinion - a rare, well-done nude. I figured that the tones and arrangement were comment-worthy. With all that said, the Nipple Factor (that's a term, now) will get a lot of attention, and we all know why. I'm not arguing this...I'm just saying that it's a nice image (again, opinion) regardless of one's subjective impressions of the content.
Thanks, a very well thought out and thorough compliment and I appreciate it :smile:
 
Shazam! I hadn't realized nudes were welcome here (learning something new every day). I will have to round out my gallery in the next upload.But I'm not offended. Sorry. :smile:
 

Media information

Album
Member Album by StoneNYC
Added by
StoneNYC
Date added
View count
2,044
Comment count
24
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
film-panf-sds-nude-stonenyc-1.jpg
File size
87.5 KB
Date taken
Thu, 31 January 2013 1:34 PM
Dimensions
692px x 850px

Share this media

Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom