20 Euro for camera and lens - you can't even buy a lens cap for a Leica with that!I just got another FED 5C locally for 20€.
Not much to say about it that hasn't been said: I'm sure it can't compare to a Leica M at all. However, after cleaning, relubrication and calibration it *does* work, supposedly, as intended. The viewfinder is not amazingly bright but it's decently big, the reflective framelines are reasonably helpful and the rangefinder patch offers good contrast. It doesn't give me any trouble focusing and once the rangefinder is calibrated, it's spot on as far as I can tell. I also checked the match-needle lightmeter against known good ones and the accuracy is entirely adequate for outdoors.
Here's the viewfinder:
The shutter makes a rather pleasing *tschunk*. It's neither quiet nor exceptionally loud – kind of middling, really.
Anyway, not a great beauty or a precision instrument but it takes pictures and the lens is actually pretty good, or rather, I have Japanese ones that leave a lot more to be desired.
20 Euro for camera and lens - you can't even buy a lens cap for a Leica with that!
Haha, basically not, no.
Fwiw the lens is held in higher regard than the FED, which has people calling it the Industar's "very ugly rear lenscap".
It's funny that you mention this because 36 × 100 = 3600 actuations.
My point is that even the vaunted Nikon F/F2 can be technically out of spec by the time it reaches one thousand actuations!
Well said! Also, the FED 5 looks the ugliest of the bunch. Those that praise these soviet lenses, apparently have never used a Leica lens. Sumicron, even today, is used as a reference lens not by luck.But highly unlikely!
Comparing a Fed/Zorki/Kiev to a Leica of any model is like comparing a surgical scalpel to a blunt kitchen knife. They will both do the job, but I know what I would prefer to use if I were to perform a medical operation.
I think Russian working weeks had more Fridays than any other days because Friday was when the workers wanted to finish early and go home and sod the quality.
the FED 5 looks the ugliest of the bunch.
Those that praise these soviet lenses, apparently have never used a Leica lens. Sumicron, even today, is used as a reference lens not by luck.
Comparing a Fed/Zorki/Kiev to a Leica of any model is like comparing a surgical scalpel to a blunt kitchen knife.
But highly unlikely!
Comparing a Fed/Zorki/Kiev to a Leica of any model is like comparing a surgical scalpel to a blunt kitchen knife. They will both do the job, but I know what I would prefer to use if I were to perform a medical operation.
I think Russian working weeks had more Fridays than any other days because Friday was when the workers wanted to finish early and go home and sod the quality.
Well said! Also, the FED 5 looks the ugliest of the bunch. Those that praise these soviet lenses, apparently have never used a Leica lens. Summicron, even today, is used as a reference lens not by luck.
Back in the last century- well around the late 60's - early 70's there was a test carried out on behalf of a weekly British Photo magazine (Amateur Photographer). This test was assessing the actual resolving power of a Summicron and the results were represented by a graph. I clearly remember the graph started quite high up the edge of the chart (Graduated from 1 to 10) That was F2 as the aperture was reduced at F2.8 it was higher and at F4 it was almost at the top of the graph and the line remained horizontal right through to F16 where there was a slight dip.
Exactly!Back in the last century- well around the late 60's - early 70's there was a test carried out on behalf of a weekly British Photo magazine (Amateur Photographer). This test was assessing the actual resolving power of a Summicron and the results were represented by a graph. I clearly remember the graph started quite high up the edge of the chart (Graduated from 1 to 10) That was F2 as the aperture was reduced at F2.8 it was higher and at F4 it was almost at the top of the graph and the line remained horizontal right through to F16 where there was a slight dip.
I have never seen any other lens display such consistency right across the different apertures. There have been sharper lenses made by a few manufacturers, but those test graphs went up and down like a relief map of the Himalayas. Unfortunately Leitz lenses are way out of my price bracket.
I have never seen any other lens display such consistency right across the different apertures.
Back in the last century- well around the late 60's - early 70's there was a test carried out on behalf of a weekly British Photo magazine (Amateur Photographer). This test was assessing the actual resolving power of a Summicron and the results were represented by a graph. I clearly remember the graph started quite high up the edge of the chart (Graduated from 1 to 10) That was F2 as the aperture was reduced at F2.8 it was higher and at F4 it was almost at the top of the graph and the line remained horizontal right through to F16 where there was a slight dip.
I have never seen any other lens display such consistency right across the different apertures. There have been sharper lenses made by a few manufacturers, but those test graphs went up and down like a relief map of the Himalayas. Unfortunately Leitz lenses are way out of my price bracket.
That's great, really. But I still think, and this might be a somewhat controversial view, that "photography" and "poring over graphs" are largely unrelated activities.
Yes, you are quite correct. But with soviet stuff so poorly made and so many inconsistencies in quality from unit to unit, you frequently get nasty surprises, from badly focused images due to uneven mount-to-film pane distances, to missaligned lens optics and to film advancing mechanisms that rip the film or bringing the frame off center up to the sprocket holes. Better save than sorry.That's great, really. But I still think, and this might be a somewhat controversial view, that "photography" and "poring over graphs" are largely unrelated activities.
Yup, he did a great job, and I got some great photos of St. Petersburg with that camera. We arrived on St. Petersburg city day, and I shot TriX in the camera as probably a thousand people were standing out in the rain in the palace square in front of the Hermitage listening to opera arias. I got some exceptional shots with it. And it still shoots great!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?