Zeiss slr lens

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 6
  • 0
  • 87
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 9
  • 1
  • 85
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 3
  • 2
  • 68
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 5
  • 1
  • 71

Forum statistics

Threads
198,945
Messages
2,783,648
Members
99,756
Latest member
Kieran Scannell
Recent bookmarks
0

H.veng.smith

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
18
Format
35mm
Hello I have a zeiss 35 2.0 for my canon eos1v
and I cannot find any info on zeiss lens and how they are in the rain,snow,harm conditions?

I have used it in very light rain with no problems but I know the 1v can really take a beating, just asking for any help from you guys on how the zeiss lens hold up.
 

Diapositivo

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
3,257
Location
Rome, Italy
Format
35mm
Zeiss web site could be helpful.

If it is this lens:
Dead Link Removed

I don't think it has any particular weather protection, because that would be mentioned.
 
OP
OP

H.veng.smith

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
18
Format
35mm
I have looked at the site and found nothing about weather sealing, it would not make sense to me to offer such a professional product and not have it made to withstand rough weather.
If canon can make great sealed lens I can’t see why zeiss couldn’t or wouldn't
 

eSPhotos

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
144
Location
Sydney Aust
Format
Multi Format
No weather sealing but they make up on build quality and of course optical quality.
 

pcyco

Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
456
Location
near vienna
Format
Multi Format
hallo

i have the 50/1.4 and they are not wheather-protected (says the guy in the shop)
--
thomas
 
OP
OP

H.veng.smith

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
18
Format
35mm
Got an email back from Zeiss in which they say they are not specially weather sealed have no problem getting wet , but should be carful in a very heavy rain.
 

Rol_Lei Nut

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
1,108
Location
Hamburg
Format
Multi Format
They're not weather sealed and they are not anything special either, aside from the 21mm. The 35mm f2 is very good.

I made the mistake of buying several of these for my Nikon. Waste of money and now I'm selling them.

Beauty (as always) is in the the eye of the beholder.

It depends on what you like/want from a lens...
 

Rol_Lei Nut

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
1,108
Location
Hamburg
Format
Multi Format
My experience of Zeiss lenses is mostly with an older generation, in Rolleiflex mount.

I certainly woudn't describe any of the ones I've had or used as "highly center-optimized".
I've also extensively used Nikkor primes of the AI/AIS generation (many of the better ones too) and can compare them directly to the Zeiss ones: In my experience the Zeiss lenses *are* often significantly (as in somehow visibly) better even using the usual parameters (sharpness across the field, distortion & vignetting). Exceptions being perhaps the 105 2.5 & the 180 ED.
That said, again IMHO, where the better Zeiss lenses shine (pun intended) is in their flare control, colour rendition and 3-d effect. In short, their general "look".
That may sound a bit esoteric, but simply is...

Just a question: it seems that many who are dissatisfied with the new Zeiss lenses aren't using them with film (which adds a whole can or worms of various interactions and so on), is that your case?
 

Rol_Lei Nut

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
1,108
Location
Hamburg
Format
Multi Format
The Zeiss lenses I was talking about are for Rolleiflex 35mm SLRs (several models built between c. 1970 and the 1990's). Often, but not always optically the same as the Yashica/Contax lenses...

Some of the new lenses are definitely different (a 35mm f/2.0 didn't exist and the 18mm has a different nominal aperture) and it seems to be debated whether others are exactly the same as their old versions.
That said, apart from the 15mm & 18mm, I have very different results regarding edge sharpness and distortion (15mm - Leica version, 18mm, 25mm, 35mm 1.4 & 2.8, 50mm 1.4 & 1.8, 85mm 1.4 & 2.8, 200mm).

The lack of aspheric elements seems to be part of Zeiss' design philosophy.
While Leica, for example, embraced aspherics and I admit that later Leica lenses are technically better than my Zeiss', I still like the overall "look" of the Zeiss' better.
 

Rol_Lei Nut

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2006
Messages
1,108
Location
Hamburg
Format
Multi Format
I often photograph architecture, landscapes and artwork, in the past I was photgraphing archaeological digs and using those photos to help produce maps. So distortion *is* something I find very important (I usually hate most zooms mainly for that reason).

While I haven't done any more "pseudo-photogrammetry" since I started using the Zeiss' (the Micro-Nikkor 55 2.8 was my favorite for that), for my uses, their distortion isn't noticeable (FLs above 18mm - from 25mm on: I have no 21mm).
For example, I use my Zeiss 25mm for achitecture without a thought, while my Nikkor 24mm was practically unusable. The Nikkor 35 2.0 also fared pretty poorly.

The digital crossover intent & poor distortion correction in the newer Zeiss' could be... It'd be interesting to see some reliable measurements (Zeiss does publish thiers, though how reliable they are & how to get other manufacturers' for comparison is the question).
 

Thingy

Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
192
Location
London, Engl
Format
Multi Format
I contacted Zeiss last year about weather sealing and they confirmed that there is none, unless you buy the more expensive, bespoke, industrial series. Having said that, the same lack of weather sealing applies to my medium format Mamiya lenses and my large format Cooke, Nikon, Schneider & Rodenstock lenses, all of which have been used in light drizzle.

Zeiss glass for both medium and 35mm format is excellent but again choosing it is also a personal matter depending upon what you seek to obtain from a specific lens. I also rate certain Mamiya lenses very highly. With the Zeiss ZF series I would avoid the 25mm but think the 21mm and 35mm f2 are superb lenses. The latter is certainly an improvement on the excellent Nikkor 35mm f1.4, and around the same price.
 

Diapositivo

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
3,257
Location
Rome, Italy
Format
35mm
The lack of aspheric elements seems to be part of Zeiss' design philosophy.
While Leica, for example, embraced aspherics and I admit that later Leica lenses are technically better than my Zeiss', I still like the overall "look" of the Zeiss' better.

Just as a curiosity note, my digital has a Zeiss zoom lens with 12 elements in 10 groups, 4 lenses are aspherical.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/R1/R1A6.HTM

This lens is a real jewel :D.

So the non-aspherical bias might be limited to only certain lens designers :wink:
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom