• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Your prefered hybrid workflow?

Forum statistics

Threads
202,627
Messages
2,843,230
Members
101,413
Latest member
USMC46
Recent bookmarks
0
Borrowing terminology from the audio arena I wonder just how many of us so-called "hybrid" photographers use any of the following workflows:

  1. AAA (pure analog)
  2. ADA (analog input, digital darkroom, analog print)
  3. ADD (analog input, digital darkroom, digital print)
  4. DDD (pure digital)
  5. DDA (digital input, digital darkroom, analog print)
I myself tend toward #2 and #3, but of course I occassionally also do #4

I currently prefer AAA or ADD, though I can do DDD.
 
ADD primarily, with DDD as my second most common option.

I rarely do some AAA.
 
This thread seems quite interesting.
I normally do AAA, and DDD, with some ADD (proofing B&Ws, and printing trannies). Before I got the enlarger, I did ADA for a while.
I may well be using DDA on a project I have on at the moment.
 
For me, mostly ADD, working toward doing mostly ADA (someday), and a little DDD every now and then.

cheers,
Ken

Borrowing terminology from the audio arena I wonder just how many of us so-called "hybrid" photographers use any of the following workflows:

  1. AAA (pure analog)
  2. ADA (analog input, digital darkroom, analog print)
  3. ADD (analog input, digital darkroom, digital print)
  4. DDD (pure digital)
  5. DDA (digital input, digital darkroom, analog print)
I myself tend toward #2 and #3, but of course I occassionally also do #4
 
Being a Maths teacher too, it seems appropriate to ADD

Being a maths teacher in urban comps I would never let colleagues know I sufferred from ADD

:surprised:

On the topic itself I guess I am AAA for BW but ADD for chromes/transparencies.
 
I was refered here from APUG as I asked a question about a digital enlarger, I asked this because to me the huge problem presently with working digitally is the ouput where the major choice is between a commercial LAB print of awful paper with flat tones (in B&W) or an ink jet, which can be just OK with a lot of work but for obvious reasons (despite what some manufacturers say) can never match a darkroom print and isn't a "photographic" (it dosen't use light to make the print) technique.
My two methods of making a photograph are
Digital Capture
Ink Jet Output (which is analog by the way, it is ink on paper not numbers, not digital)
or
Film Capture
Darkroom Print.

I wish to combine the two
Digital capture
Darkroom output.
 
Metro Imaging in London UK will make fibre prints from digital files for you on the new Harmon Digital Fibre Base Papers.
Picto in France will do this as well.

I was refered here from APUG as I asked a question about a digital enlarger, I asked this because to me the huge problem presently with working digitally is the ouput where the major choice is between a commercial LAB print of awful paper with flat tones (in B&W) or an ink jet, which can be just OK with a lot of work but for obvious reasons (despite what some manufacturers say) can never match a darkroom print and isn't a "photographic" (it dosen't use light to make the print) technique.
My two methods of making a photograph are
Digital Capture
Ink Jet Output (which is analog by the way, it is ink on paper not numbers, not digital)
or
Film Capture
Darkroom Print.

I wish to combine the two
Digital capture
Darkroom output.
 
because I suffer from it.... ADD (although the output is generally to RA-4 paper, not inkjet)
 
Well, I started AAA like most of us. Moved to ADD, but I never was happy with the inkjet output. It was OK, but for me, it just seemed to lack soul (and a decent black :smile: ). Now, I am either ADA or DDA meaning a digital negative to an alternative process. Well, OK, I also moved back to the wet darkroom and work AAA also. I think I now have the best of all worlds.
 
I would like to hear from people who were DDA, particularly with Platinum, Palladium or Kallitype as an end product. I am thinking about buying a printer to make digi-negs and using a Canon 20D for capture. Anyone doing this?
Neal
 
So what would we call a process wherein you print digitally but then
manually add paint/tones/washes/pencil to the print? is that ADA?? or
something else?


Good question. I'm a painter-printmaker who has moved into photography as
an end result now, instead of just reference for my other work. Traditionally,
artworks created with several different mediums as you suggest, have been
called "mixed media", as in an etching with some hand coloring, or a pastel
that begins with a watercolor wash to establish undertones.


The work I'm doing now is ADveryA ( film neg >> scan and adjust then output
inkjet positive to expose photopolymer plate to UV >> then use plate to make
traditional etching with intaglio press (very analog ) )


I started out many years ago AAA, and still enjoy the darkroom a lot. Digital
capture is getting very tempting though... :rolleyes:

Susan
 
AAA 10% (color -> subcontractor with a professional lab, up to 60x90 cm)
ADD 90% (color -> scanning inhouse, printing up to 40x60 inhouse, larger formats the professional lab)

Is there any other way to capture than analog? :D
 
I'm looking at a bit of an odd workflow; since it'll be a while before I have room for an enlarger, (rent house with a badly laid-out bathroom and no other rooms even close to light-tight enough to try) I'm stuck with ADD (analog up until scanning the negs) but I want to get to the point of doing AAA, AAD, and once I can afford a digital camera better than my current point & hope-for-the-best Samsung S730, all of the above.
 
ADA All the Way!!
 
ADD
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom