I bought a GW690II USED from B&H sometime in the late 90's. Fabulous camera. Just in case I bought 2 more type GW690III and a GSW690III. These cameras are jewels. My favorite all around cameras.My last new film camera was a Fuji GW690II that I bought from B&H in 1991. It is big and clunky to use but has amazing optical quality. In 2016, I broke it (I know, I know, I was a klutz) on my Route 66 trip, so I sent it to Fuji repair from a little town in Arizona, thanks to a helpful UPS store. Thereafter, I continued my trip with digital only ☹. Lesson: take a spare film camera, even if only a compact 35mm. The example below is Drew, Mississippi, taken on Kodak Panatomic-X film.
View attachment 193961
Wow, I am impressed, you like really big jewelry. Actually, I would classify a Rolleiflex as more jewel-like because it is smaller and has that German precise feeling to it. The 3.5E below came from an eBay seller in 2016. Short story: around 1980 or 1981, genuine old-tradition Rolleiflexes were still available brand new from the New York mail order stores. The 2.8F model cost about $2000, which was a big chunk in 1980. At that time, a Hasselblad 500 and lens was $1300. Of course, after Rollei's bankruptcy in the mid-1980s, many photographers and I wished we had bought one of those new 2.8Fs when we could.I bought a GW690II USED from B&H sometime in the late 90's. Fabulous camera. Just in case I bought 2 more type GW690III and a GSW690III. These cameras are jewels. My favorite all around cameras.
Mike
Wow, I am impressed, you like really big jewelry. Actually, I would classify a Rolleiflex as more jewel-like because it is smaller and has that German precise feeling to it. The 3.5E below came from an eBay seller in 2016. Short story: around 1980 or 1981, brand new genuine old-tradition Rolleiflexes were still available brand new from the New York mail order stores. The 2.8F model cost about $2000, which was a big chunk in 1980. At that time, a Hasselblad 500 and lens was $1300. Of course, after Rollei's bankruptcy in the mid-1980s, many photographers and I wished we had bought one of those new 2.8Fs when we could.
View attachment 193963
Same here. I've never been wealthy, and new cameras were always too pricey for me. When used, they fell in a reasonable price range instead.Have never bought a new camera .I always let someone else pay full price
I had one of those but had to return it. It decided 14 frames into a roll that it was never going to advance again. That was only my second roll with it. I did like a few of the photos I got out of it though.Diana mini not new but not old either. Pressing the shutter is one terrible experience, even though I like the form factor.
I had one of those but had to return it. It decided 14 frames into a roll that it was never going to advance again. That was only my second roll with it. I did like a few of the photos I got out of it though.
I had one of those but had to return it. It decided 14 frames into a roll that it was never going to advance again. That was only my second roll with it. I did like a few of the photos I got out of it though.
It occurs to me that people who are happy with a single camera are much more likely to look to buy something new than those of us who like cameras and own several.
...
Fuji instax mini neo 90 (the only camera I regret buying)
...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?