Your best semi-stand experiences?

From the Garden

D
From the Garden

  • 1
  • 0
  • 289
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 6
  • 1
  • 640
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

  • 3
  • 1
  • 736
Johnny Mills Shoal

H
Johnny Mills Shoal

  • 2
  • 1
  • 630
The Two Wisemen.jpg

H
The Two Wisemen.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 586

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,296
Messages
2,789,306
Members
99,861
Latest member
Thomas1971
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
2,193
Location
Mars Hill, NC
Format
Multi Format
I think you will find that the Paterson tank and reel are likely implicated in bromide drag. I've done a ton of testing over the past several years and found that the more contact the film has with its support structure, the more drag you risk. Similarly, getting the reel of the bottom of the tank lets gravity pull away the byproducts during stand and reduces the risk of streaking.

For these reasons, I use only Nikor stainless reels in a tank twice as large as needed. I invert a funnel at the bottom of the tank and place the loaded reel on top of it. This suspends the film well above the bottom, and the Nikor reel design appears to have minimal tendency toward bromide drag since so little is in contact with the film. YMMV

I too use SS tanks and Hewes reels. But I don't bother to add space at the bottom of the tank. Using this equipment, I've never had bromide drag in 20 years of semistand development of 120 roll film.
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
2,193
Location
Mars Hill, NC
Format
Multi Format
With *these three* (rodinal, HC-110, caffenol) I would not call semi-stand a safe method. From the numerous threads on the subject and personnal experience, even with extensive testing to find the ideal combination of agitation, reel positionning... and so on to eliminate bromide drag, the risk is still there and shouldn't be underestimated.

I can speak only for Rodinal. Semistand development of 120 roll film in highly-diluted (<1:100) Rodinal is riskfree.
 

What About Bob

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
651
Location
Northampton, MA.
Format
Analog
It works really well, especially at high dilutions. Here is a scan of a print made from a 9x12cm negative developed in D:23 1+9 with 0.5 g/l lye added. The high dilution gives you great sharpness:


However, this comes at the cost of consdiderably more visible grain in smaller formats like 35mm:


I've gotten really good semistand results in D-23 1+3 that is a more day-to-day balance between sharpness and grain.
It's like Rodinal on steroids. D23 is capable of a lot.

Curious to see how 1:3 would perform with Kentmere 400.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
1,817
Location
Plymouth. UK
Format
Multi Format
I have only done semi-stand with Caffenol, and wonder what other developers/routines would work in semi-stand mode.
Success stories?

Psst.. I know semi-stand is heresy to many, but why not have some fun with stuff.. and I was nice enough to not to mention extreme s-s! We are all friends, here, as Big Sandy like to say.

Have a look at the web darkroom website by Andrew Sanderson who sometimes employs dilute/static for night photography using diluted ID11.

Can't seem to make a link on my phone.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom