You favorite "socially acceptable" 35mm camera?

Forum statistics

Threads
198,325
Messages
2,773,042
Members
99,593
Latest member
StephenWu
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
Weegee-International_Center_of_Photography.jpg


Back when men were men, cameras were cameras, and sheep were scared...

:tongue:

Ken
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Messages
79
Location
CT
Format
35mm
I find that no one has a problem with my yashica electro 35, I think anything before the 70s- early 80s era that's boxy and chrome is pretty unobtrusive. (though more often i find myself using a Minolta hi-matics, as the auto focus is very useful when I just want a shot.) It's when you bring your T90 with a 72mm 35-105 lens when you have a problem
 

Black Dog

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2003
Messages
4,291
Location
Running up that hill
Format
Multi Format
Weegee-International_Center_of_Photography.jpg


Back when men were men, cameras were cameras, and sheep were scared...

:tongue:

Ken

Watch out you don't drop any cigar ash on the bellows and burn a hole in them!
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
19
Format
35mm
I hate being "that guy" who whips out my Nikon F100 during parties and social gatherings- I guess I need something more "socially acceptable"
Any ideas? Olympus XA? Contax G1?

I've just recentely rediscovered my love of photography so I'm not really sure yet. I think my pair of Nikon F4S's might be a bit intrusive. I do have an old Contax TVS and will probably make that my 'socially acceptable' camera.
 

John_Nikon_F

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
1,963
Location
Duvall, WA,
Format
Multi Format
Probably the one in the middle.



Modified Nikomat FT2. Hot shoe deleted, so it became an FTn. But, unlike an FTn, still used modern batteries. Pair it with a 50/2 Nikkor-H or a 45/2.8 GN Nikkor and some fast film, and you've something that'll be "socially acceptable".

-J
 

kivis

Member
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
312
Location
South Florid
Format
35mm
Probably the one in the middle.



Modified Nikomat FT2. Hot shoe deleted, so it became an FTn. But, unlike an FTn, still used modern batteries. Pair it with a 50/2 Nikkor-H or a 45/2.8 GN Nikkor and some fast film, and you've something that'll be "socially acceptable".

-J
Wow, exactly how did you get the hot shoe off your FT2?
 

blockend

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
5,049
Location
northern eng
Format
35mm
If the situation is suspicious of photography it won't matter if you're using a Deardorff or a Minox, you will only triumph by force of personality and chutzpah. Bruce Gilden has taken shots of Russian and Japanese gangsters. I doubt they cared whether his camera was socially acceptable.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,629
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
I hate being "that guy" who whips out my Nikon F100 during parties and social gatherings- I guess I need something more "socially acceptable"
Any ideas? Olympus XA? Contax G1?

You can't hide it.You are 'that guy' and you know it, don't you?:smile:
 

filmamigo

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2007
Messages
315
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
I think the F100 is a great party camera. Usually what's intimidating are the lenses. Put on a "D" era fast 50mm, 35mm or 85mm and you are unobtrusive. F100 also works well with bounce flash, and people appreciate not being blasted in the face by flash.

But if you MUST look like you are not a photographer, the Nikon L35AF has a great little lens and looks like Grandma's happy snapper.
 

michr

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
440
Format
Multi Format
People don't like being the target of a big long lens. I don't know if it's something deeply primal about being examined by a huge eye, or what. But my recollection of that feeling is one of being under the microscope, where every flaw is revealed. In some ways it feels like an invasion of your personal space.

For a non-photographer, they won't know that your field of view is very narrow. You could be photographing over their heads and it would still feel like the camera is pointing right at them.

So in that context, a socially acceptable camera makes a lot of sense. As a photographer, and an observer of people, I like to imagine (I don't know how it goes in practice) that I'd like to have as little impact on other's behaviors as possible. I'd like people to be themselves, not mug for the camera. A cell phone is often ok for these environments, it's commonplace, relatively unobtrusive, completely quiet and using it to take lots of photos is considered normal. For film, I think any rangefinder will a normal/wide lens is just fine. TLRs can be lots of fun, since their isn't a direct gaze involved, and people love talking with you about them.
 

DannL.

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2013
Messages
617
Format
Large Format
The Olympus OM-1 (all black version) would be perfect, I would think. It's tiny and just too cute to be taken seriously.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
Love my XA. It's small and it doesn't look threatening. With an XA, it looks like you're shooting for fun, but the camera has optics of more "professional" cameras. I shot with it while I was in Turkey this summer and I'm sure I looked just like a tourist innocent snapping for prosterity.
 

Hatchetman

Member
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
1,553
Location
Chicago, IL
Format
Multi Format
Socially acceptable I assume means you with people and close focus which means a Rollei 35 with no rangefinder is a PITA. Unless you like massive grain of high speed film.
 

John_Nikon_F

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
1,963
Location
Duvall, WA,
Format
Multi Format
Wow, exactly how did you get the hot shoe off your FT2?

Remove the top cover, remove the four screws holding the shoe, disconnect the wire that goes to it from the small circuit board next to the rewind shaft, reassemble, then cut a square piece of leatherette to glue in place of the shoe. Looks like an FTn with a slightly blockier prism shape above the nameplate. Otherwise, it's the same. The modification does permit an FTn style accessory shoe to be used, so if you plan to use a 21/4 Nikkor-O or one of the early fishies, you don't have to hunt down the now somewhat uncommon AS-2 adapter. If I get another FT2 (or an FT3), I'll probably do the same conversion and drop a J screen in as well. I almost never use flash with analog gear, so a hot shoe really is kinda irrelevant to me.

-J
 

TenSpeed

Member
Joined
May 25, 2015
Messages
148
Format
Multi Format
eos 1v, canon ae1, olympus xa, and xa2

i take them all out with me :shrug:
 

adknrsst

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Messages
6
Format
35mm
Varies by social circumstance.

Out with people roughly in their 30s and 40s? F3. Early eighties design and painted, engraved markings on the lens = nostalgia towards fine things from before our births.

Just going around for pictures of opportunity? F5; subtlety is for elephants. Yes it covers half my face. But the nineties retrofuturism! It's like a camera from 2020, and it hasn't aged a minute. *ka-shunk*

Somewhere with a bunch of gosh-darned hipsters? Fed 2 and an East German selenium-cell light meter. Old hipsters? Zorki 1.

The common theme is a bit of kit that rings pleasantly archaic to the people you're with, i.e. excluding the Dirty Plastic Era of electronics for their own sake.
 

MFstooges

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Messages
955
Format
35mm
"Socially Acceptable"? Sounds like a term coined for Gen-Y folks who texts each other on same dining table. If I need a camera that is "Socially Acceptable", I would whip out my Pentax 67II and make sure to fire the friggin' beast next to someone's ear.
Hey Gen-Y is all about making statement and 'I am so unique' right??
 

Shootar401

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2012
Messages
399
Location
New England
Format
Large Format
I have an FT3 with the nameplate removed. It isn't needed as there are no indexing parts that need to be enclosed. A black Nikkormat FT3 with no nameplate. Draws very little attention. It's only good enough for me to know I've got the best Nikon ever made.

The FT3 is not the best Nikon ever made
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,296
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I have an FT3 with the nameplate removed. It isn't needed as there are no indexing parts that need to be enclosed. A black Nikkormat FT3 with no nameplate. Draws very little attention. It's only good enough for me to know I've got the best Nikon ever made.

The FT3 is not the best Nikon ever made

The F100 is the best Nikon made.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom