Staining mostly in the light areas of the print suggest inadequate fixing, because that's the part of the print where fixing does the most work in removing undeveloped silver. Toning tends to accentuate anything that's gone wrong in previous stages.
How fresh were both fixer baths?
Both baths were freshly mixed, and I tried that twice with different prints. I’m aware of this risk so I wanted to exclude any possibility of exhausted fixer. Is it possible that the staining is cause by some fixer leftovers in the toner? I found various different opinions like that you have to do full wash before toning OR go straight from fix #2 while skipping any wash (claiming that partial wash might cause it), but I’m not sure if that’s my issue.
I agree that somewhere in the processing, undeveloped silver must be left. Since two-bath fixing is already used, one of those baths must be close to be exhausted.
Fixer (...)
then into holding tray with plain water and once all prints are ready, I continue
Hi,
imo here is the problem:
I always do selenium toning with fully washed prints, no problems like yours with any FB paper incl. Ilford MGW or Galerie.
Jens
Wash for an hour and let me know how it goes. I haven’t toned in a while because of staining. But the least stained were after an hour washing.
a complete wash before toning is indeed suggested but,I thought the OP did that?
I did not full wash actually as I thought I don’t have to, given that some folks go straight from fix #2 to selenium. So they were just hold in tray with still water untiĺ all were ready to tone, probably ranging from 10-30 minutes, without much movement.
Hi,
imo here is the problem:
I always do selenium toning with fully washed prints, no problems like yours with any FB paper incl. Ilford MGW or Galerie.
Jens
+1. This is what cured the problem for me. My guess as to what’s happening (which may be total superstition, of course) is that you have wash out the silver compounds created by the fixer, otherwise they react with the toner and become stuck in situ. Two fixer baths is definitely advantageous, but I also try to give FB prints a full minute in acetic acid stop bath before fixing.
I did not full wash actually as I thought I don’t have to, given that some folks go straight from fix #2 to selenium. So they were just hold in tray with still water untiĺ all were ready to tone, probably ranging from 10-30 minutes, without much movement.
That's right, your toner has fixer in it.
Which is why fixing after selenium toning is not necessary. Although arguably, the concentration of thiosulfate may end up so low in a reused Se-toner that it may cease to be sufficiently effective. Still, even with re-used toner, I've never seen any need for fixing after Se-toning. Develop, stop, fix, holding tray, wash of >2 cycles and at least a few minutes, Se-toner, archival wash. This has always worked fine for me.
There are two completely different work flows (hate that term) that work for me, using Kodak Rapid Selenium Toner.
Conventional, archival process, wash the heck (and the fixer) out and then tone, refix (yes, refix), HCA and wash the hell (and the fix) out again.
Two, take a print directly out of fixer two and plop it in the selenium toner without draining or rinsing, tone, rinse, HCA, archival wash.
...
Hi,
imo here is the problem:
I always do selenium toning with fully washed prints, no problems like yours with any FB paper incl. Ilford MGW or Galerie.
Jens
IIRC, the other approach is to go straight from the fixer to the toner, with no intervening rinse.
That will decrease the amount of use you get from your toner though - which itself has fixer in it.
I found that going from fix to toner requires really fresh fixer. Any itty-bitty-bit of silver in the fixer bath and it's stain city.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?