Svenedin
Member
A photo I wanted to show earlier but it didn't show up, which is now resolved.
HP5+ with yellow filter Y48.
![]()
Nice clouds! Good use of a yellow filter.
A photo I wanted to show earlier but it didn't show up, which is now resolved.
HP5+ with yellow filter Y48.
![]()
Nice clouds! Good use of a yellow filter.
Actually, a yellow filter lives on my Fuji W 300mm, but it comes off with the lens cap for most of my work. There is the practical side of it. Using a view camera, putting on or removing a filter takes almost no time relative the total amount of time it takes to make a photograph. With roll film it is the opposite, and what do you do with the filter (which pocket is it in...)? Much easier leaving it on I suppose.It’s more like the habit of keeping a UV filter on the lens at all times for protection. For me, landscapes are my thing so a yellow filter is useful to me far more often than not. I am not a fan of blank, white skies -sometimes unavoidable.
Thanks. It's a bit grainy though even for 35mm, I fear it's a bit overdeveloped ...
I re-read your post #17 and I agree more than I initially did. It is a fact that much of the UV light is passing through clouds, about 50% on average I think. So that could explain why contrast is enhanced even when no clear sky is visible.
....I am not a fan of overly dark skies and I appreciate atmospheric distance. I stopped using a yellow filter with TMax films. Seemed like a yellow filter with Tri-X, Pan-X, etc corrected the film so that it recorded the sky pretty much like our (my) eyes see it. TMax does that without filters, so the yellow has more effect than I like now. And I have development control of each negative, so I can control the sky values that way. Over-all, I usually do not have sky in my images, but in Death Valley, one often does not have a lot of choice! Below is about as dark as I go! Spring, Death Valley. Platinum/palladium print, 8x10
That's an interesting point. I do a lot of architecture in a classic style; I like to have a very clean image without any distraction (even avoiding people and cars etc.). So sometimes I wonder if it isn't better to have a plain sky. Clouds are a random phenomenon and they don't always fit in the picture.
I noticed this cloud only after the film was developed
![]()
It depends a lot one ones personal aims, preferences, professional needs, and such. A dark sky is more dramatic, I must admit. I enjoy experiencing and using the light reflected off the landscape -- and attempt to express that experience to the viewer. Generally, that means that I do not wish to significantly reduce the luminosity of the source of light for the landscape (the sky).
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |