I've not used Mytol myself, but my understanding is that its environmental impact compared to XTOL is nearly identical. Both are phenidone/ascorbate (PC) developers, and so contain no metol or hydroquinone. XTOL is described in patent documents, although the commercial developer may not be identical to what's described in the patents. Its ingredient list is very similar to that of Mytol -- XTOL adds EDTA disodium, uses a bit more sodium sulfite, and uses Dimezone S rather than phenidone. (Dimezone S is a phenidone variant that's supposed to have superior keeping qualities.) Of course, small differences in formulation, including variations from Kodak's patent filings, could produce differences in results, so I wouldn't want to claim that Mytol will create results identical to XTOL. I've heard that it is pretty similar, but that's just hearsay.