Good point.
@DavidClapp can you tell us what we are looking at in post #1 and post #22? Are your photo examples scans of negatives which have been converted to positive? Or are they scans of paper prints?
Good point.Given that the television aerial and the branches and twigs in the image in post 22 are not affected by the marks, the cause of those marks is not foreign matter on the negatives. The negatives should go back to the processor for an explanation, as the OP won't find the answer here on Photrio.
Given that the television aerial and the branches and twigs in the image in post 22 are not affected by the marks, the cause of those marks is not foreign matter on the negatives. The negatives should go back to the processor for an explanation, as the OP won't find the answer here on Photrio.
That's a great catch! It's likely that lamerko was correct in his first post that there is residual silver that wasn't bleached and fixed out.
As this was a lab processed film what in the processing might have caused what appears to be a temporary "glitch" in the processing that only affected frames 33-36?
The only thing I can think of is that the lab might have spotted the fault once this film had finished processing. It then corrected its bleach and fix steps which resulted in the OP's next film being OK
However this is pure speculation on my part and seems to rely on the fault occurring on exactly the 33rd frame of the last film before the Lab spotted it and rectified it
The problem I have is that I have no idea if lab's do one film at a time and examine the film each time or even if it is possible for the bleach and or fix to go wrong on precisely one frame such that all previous frames are OK then suddenly none are OK?
pentaxuser
33/36, not 33-36.
Given that the television aerial and the branches and twigs in the image in post 22 are not affected by the marks, the cause of those marks is not foreign matter on the negatives. The negatives should go back to the processor for an explanation, as the OP won't find the answer here on Photrio.
Probably some Remjet floating around from some maverick movie film
Probably some Remjet floating around from some maverick movie film
Maverick movie film! In that case it must involve James Garner
pentaxuser
Actually, Top Gun would be more likely. After all, it does seem prevalent in the skies!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?