I failed to attach pictures of the results of abhorrent experiences as they are of large size and the forum refuses to allow this size to be raised and I do not know what to do?
These photos were taken so that they contain a part of them exposed to direct sunlight and another part exposed to full shade so that we will know how the developer dealt with the details in the shadow.If you have any image editor, it's quite easy to reduce yourself the size of your pictures.
This Ilford PAN 100 has expired somewhat recently.@mohmad khatab:
Which film is this? What was the dilution?
It's going to be a pain transforming the developer you have into another developer. You can look at ID-62 or some such universal PQ developers and see if by adding you can get close to any of them.
What do you do if you were my place@mohmad khatab:
Which film is this? What was the dilution?
It's going to be a pain transforming the developer you have into another developer. You can look at ID-62 or some such universal PQ developers and see if by adding you can get close to any of them.
I almost softened in a ratio of 1: 6Have you tried diluting the developer so the developing times are longer? You may have something that acts a bit like rodinal in that respect. Start your experimenting at 1:10 and work your way up using it one shot until you find either good times and results or the developer starts to exhaust before the film is done.
If you arrive at a development time of 4 minutes with a dilution of 1:6, then yes, I'd expect that you can dilute much further to get longer times. Try 1:15 or so and see what you get.Do you expect that this developer can do this without any modifications and result in good and balanced images?
Hello Mohmad,Any expert man here tells me about his point ,,
I have attached the formula that I prepared for you and I have four liters in my possession
,, While we now want to convert it to another format now,
Please tell me what I need to do and I will stick to your instructions.
Theoretically, your point of view is quite correct.If you arrive at a development time of 4 minutes with a dilution of 1:6, then yes, I'd expect that you can dilute much further to get longer times. Try 1:15 or so and see what you get.
I have four liters of another formula called (G.242) which is from the Belgian company Geavart ,,, you will find the formula is very close to that formula except for the slight differences.Hello Mohmad,
in this formula I see some components and quantities I found in some Agfa/Orwo recipes, in my Agfa and Orwo notebooks, used for Rongten process or strong alkali repro-developers, like Orwo 70 or Orwo 80 and they are quite hard contrast.
The idea from koraks is a very good one, and you can try also other dilutions adjusting a little the development time.
I didn't quite understand your basic idea.Hard to tell. Im not familiar with many of the ingredients. If its acting like a lith developer(going by the hydroquine present) and making the film too contrasty it might need something like phenidone or metol to balance it out unless the unfamiliar ingredients are analogous to those.
Theoretically, your point of view is quite correct.
- But I showed some of the sample images that were developed using that format.
Did you look at it?
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13EJzQHr3xFPSwfFcZt1rh8IbEvc8CPoZ?usp=sharing
According to digitaltruth site, the Agfa Gevaert 242 (https://www.digitaltruth.com/data/formula.php?FormulaID=83) is for X-Ray and Aerial films and you should use undiluted and it's a rapid one, I suppose it should develop in 1 or 2 mins.I have four liters of another formula called (G.242) which is from the Belgian company Geavart ,,, you will find the formula is very close to that formula except for the slight differences.
1:6Which dilution did you use for those photo? 1:15? How much time?
Yes ,, this developer is very fast and frightening ,, and difficult to control, it is like a lion ,, difficult to tame ,, I don’t know how we can tame it ... these developers consumed a lot of raw chemicals and it was very expensive ,,,According to digitaltruth site, the Agfa Gevaert 242 (https://www.digitaltruth.com/data/formula.php?FormulaID=83) is for X-Ray and Aerial films and you should use undiluted and it's a rapid one, I suppose it should develop in 1 or 2 mins.
I should like have it right nowYes ,, this developer is very fast and frightening ,, and difficult to control, it is like a lion ,, difficult to tame ,, I don’t know how we can tame it ... these developers consumed a lot of raw chemicals and it was very expensive ,,,
I have four liters of Fuji formula, and four liters of G242
I am trying to take advantage of these solutions to sell them to amateur photographers at cost.
If you were in Egypt, I would give you what you want from these powerful developers courtesy.I should like have it right nowI am fighting with an aerial film Aviphot Pan 200 and all the developer I have generate a thin negative no matter the dilution I am using... I have to try undiluted.
About yours, try, for example, 1+19 for 8 min.
I like 1+19 because I use 500ml of working solution, and it's an easy division.
Yes, I looked at them and I suggested diluting to 1+15 instead of 1+6. Did you try this?Theoretically, your point of view is quite correct.
- But I showed some of the sample images that were developed using that format.
Did you look at it?
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13EJzQHr3xFPSwfFcZt1rh8IbEvc8CPoZ?usp=sharing
Thanks a lot, Mohmad! I was only one time in Cairo, but I have to go back!If you were in Egypt, I would give you what you want from these powerful developers courtesy.
The aerial film will submit to the control of this mighty developer.
Well, I'm going to try it on a little bit and do a test and I'll tell you the results ,,Yes, I looked at them and I suggested diluting to 1+15 instead of 1+6. Did you try this?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?