Do YOU intend to represent me, Bob? If so, we'll talk. Yes, I'd like to meet face to face with you one of these days. But "artists statements"? Laughable. Maybe if someone is trying to get their foot in the door with an NEA grant, and needs to come up with some convoluted explanation why
they have preference due to some overtly politcally-correct spin on some airhead's definition of creativity; but that would be more of a resume fishing expedition thing than a "statement". I follow Hannibal Lecter's advice: people covet what they see. A single print speaks more than five hundred pages of words. I have nothing against intelligently written art criticism, and enjoy reading that kind of thing myself, and will admit that in a few instances I've thrown titles on works just to mess with people's heads, though ordinarily that is not my practice. But I wasn't kidding - I've turned
down airheaded galleries. No, I haven't been active for awhile. Too many pressing family responsibilities. My last gig was a major publicly-funded
exhibition timed immediately after another person's death, basically a two-man retrospective, not a private gallery. The overall display was considered far too valuable to travel to other cities. An insurance limitation. It came out of a huge vault and right back in. I've still got a couple of my own big framed Cibachromes left over from that. So yeah, give me the names of the top ten most famous 20th C photographers. I've either been displayed side by side with em or had prints outright purchased with em. Some big name painters too. And I come from a significant art family, in
fact, the one with more 20th C art on our US Natl Historical Register than anyone else. So I know about the NEA, at least back when they laughed
at resumes and artists statement too, and picked people according to their visual skills rather than wordsmith powers. Poetry contest are a different
category, and I still presume this is a photography forum.