Would you recommend Tri-X or HP5+ for pushing? (and other questions about pushing film)

Forum statistics

Threads
199,366
Messages
2,790,413
Members
99,886
Latest member
Squiggs32
Recent bookmarks
0

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,785
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
You can overdevelop film, but you cannot compensate for underexposure. Impossible.

Yep, when working as a PJ we were always told to error on the side of overexposure, you can get print from a dense negative, but if it is not there it is not there. But in the 70 and 80s when B&W was king pushing was a necessary evil. As the paper started to print in color, for the daily, prior there was color on Sunday and on Wednesday the food section supplement, we had to revert to high powered flash and pushing became uncommon.
 
  • Andrew O'Neill
  • Andrew O'Neill
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Pointless arguing with a know it all lol
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
636
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
As I think about it, the Carlsbad caverns are well lit with spot lights. I wonder if a 400 speed film would be fast enough. Its been maybe 30 years that I was toured Carlsbad, but I renumber shooting Trix and maybe Kodacolor 400, with a faster lens like a 50 1.7 or 1.4.

Carlsbad is indeed better lit than any other cavern I've been to. With ISO 400 and F/3.5 there were spots that I could easily shoot handheld, but that was a small fraction of the shots I wanted to take. I really didn't plan this well; the trip was a spur of the moment thing. I look forward to going back, next time armed with my new TMZ in my film camera and my F/0.95 lens in my digital camera.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,700
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Caves are typically rather 3-dimensional scenes, which means that shooting at a large aperture will bring limitations in depth of field. Whether that will be a concern is up to you to decide, but personally I'd experience this as a major problem. Sufficient depth of field means stopping down, which means that no film, push-processed or not, will be adequate for handheld shooting. You can get some frames, but will they even be worth printing? Again, it's personal. And personally, I wouldn't bother.

The most suitable tool for the job would be something digital with a very small sensor (=large depth of field by default) and image stabilization. Most modern smartphones would qualify. Convenient to carry around as well.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom