The outside of the lenses look fine to me .
The photos are poor quality , most likely taken with a camera phone , and turn to mush as you enlarge them on a screen .
So not really helpful , main thing they show is dust on them and no signs of damage / abuse .
Lenses in a bag sometimes rub together causing these very fine scratches , which look to be the case here .
There are no dents shown on the two photos , on the side you can see .
These lenses are both from around 1985 to around 1988 ( as are mine and many other lenses I have )
Given the age , they look fine to me , on the outside .
Inside is the critical thing !
If you interested , email the seller and ask ;
1; are the lenses clean and clear and free of mould / fungus ?
Some dust is to be expected and makes no difference , a lot of haze isn't good .
Do not buy a lens with fungus in it .
2 ; ask if the aperture springs back shut when the lever is moved ( the aperture should be clear of any oil deposits and move freely and snappily in both directions ).
If the lenses are mouldy or have oily / sticking aperture blades , forget it .
Minor marks ( scratches ) on the front lens element aren't an issue , the rear element wants to be free of marks as this has a greater impact on image quality .
I bought a used £800 worth lens for £500 a few years back as it was listed as having a scratched front element , with a very close up photo on the listing .
Looked huge .
The scratch was only 1/4" long and not too deep .
I painted a bit of black ink in it to prevent flair and it's a fantastic lens .
See what the seller says , ask for better pictures of the lenses from both ends if possible .
If the final price is right , I'd take the chance anyway , as long as there fungus free .
If in his reply to you he says there is no sign of mould , and then there turns out to be , they can be returned at no cost to you as sold as "not as described " .
I've sent quite a few things back that were faulty recently that were discribed as in good condition and full working order .
PayPal eBay always sides with the buyer , so so long as you ask the right questions if the information's not in the listing your covered .
It's up to the seller to know what there selling and list it accordingly .
The camera and lenses here are the first proper camera and lenses I owned ( along with the 35-70mm f/4 ) that I bought used in the mid 90's .
They worked well for me until I got a Sony a100 DSLR to use the lenses on .
I still have them and use especially the 70-210mm today on my a900 and other cameras .
I upgraded to Minolta 7000AF to a Dynax 7 & Dynax 9 , there world's ahead of it !
Your 7000i has much better AF than the 7000AF though , and nice to use .