wondering about shifting from my Toho

Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
DINO Acting Up !

A
DINO Acting Up !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
What Have They Seen?

A
What Have They Seen?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Lady With Attitude !

A
Lady With Attitude !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,755
Messages
2,780,465
Members
99,698
Latest member
Fedia
Recent bookmarks
0

pellicle

Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
1,175
Location
Finland
Format
4x5 Format
Hi

I've been a (relatively) happy Toho user for some time. I like the lightness and like the (seemingly) limitless ability to adjust everything (just like a rail camera).

After some years (7) I've been finding myself unhappy (read unable to become comfortable) with the fact that all tilts are base tilts while swings are center. I find that I am more comfortable with center pivot.

I'm also a little unhappy with the cameras 'rigidity' in some situations. I've solved that to some extent with a bit of bamboo chopstick and some blue tac I carry now to 'steady' the top standards. However I'm interested (despite the issues I read about) in the Chamonix.

I occasionally lament the difficulty of getting the round lens boards on the Toho, and the lack of "grafloc back". I also find that it takes some moretime to setup, however I'm happier leaving the rail on the tripod and packing the body (bellows and standards) away. It does of course mean lens removal.

I think that the chamonix will allow a lens (say my 180mm) to be left on the board when folding the camera away or even just folding the camera down more simply ... dunno

does anyone thoughts on this dilema? I'm sure I'll not get much for the Toho if I sell it so I might just break even ...
 

Peter Schrager

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
4,158
Location
fairfield co
Format
Large Format
Ritter Camera

I vote for the Ritter view camera as I just spent a week out in the field observing how they work...which happens to be superb....and don't forget to send your camera back to China for repair....(or to Richard)
Best, Peter
 

John Jarosz

Member
Joined
May 17, 2006
Messages
145
Location
Fairfax Iowa
Format
ULarge Format
From what I see, all ULF cameras require the user to accept compromises. And every item you have mentioned is really a personal preference. Until you use other ULF cameras you really won't know how your preferences fit in with the other cameras.

In spite of your complaints, your opening sentence says that you like what you are using. So I can see you have to make a difficult decision. You should base your decision on whatever path will allow you to use the camera more.

John
 
OP
OP
pellicle

pellicle

Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
1,175
Location
Finland
Format
4x5 Format
oh dear ... this should not be in ULF ... its only LF (and a small one at that)
 

jeroldharter

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
1,955
Location
Wisconsin
Format
4x5 Format
You don't mention your range of focal lengths. A lot of field cameras have just base tilts. Consider a Toyo field camera which has axis tilts on the front but bast tilts on the back.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom