Widelux...........

Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 3
  • 0
  • 21
Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 5
  • 0
  • 61
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 2
  • 2
  • 60
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 59

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,822
Messages
2,781,409
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,220
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
..........anybody own one of these things.?
How do you like it.?
A quick check on Ebay shows Big Prices for these cameras........................800-2000 USD seems common.
 

Jesper

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 29, 2009
Messages
878
Location
Sweden
Format
Multi Format
Very happy with the one I´ve got. Just two things to consider. Make sure that there is no banding (darker/lighter bands on the negative due to uneven movement) and the filters may be hard to come by (an expensive).

The pictures have a very special character and requires some consideration when photographing (sometimes you want the effect and sometimes not). If you are just into panorama pictures maybe you should consider Hasselblad Xpan.
 

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,467
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
I had an F6 for a while, it was fun to use.
I second the warning about "banding", that's a concern with rotating-lens cameras.
If you are on a budget, you might consider the Soviet "Horizont", a similar design, to try out and see how you like the format. You wouldn't lose much re-selling it. They are much less expensive, but can be prone to issues. They have a removable viewfinder...don't buy one without it.
There is significant distortion when not shot level, although that can be used for creative purposes.
Check out Jeff Bridges' photography, he uses a Widelux very well.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
I hated the F7 and F8 that I had. I got sucked into buying them after checking out Jeff Bridges' fantastic work.
But for me? The worst handling/haptics of any camera I ever owned. Awful positioning of the viewfinder where you can't see most of what will be in the right side of the image. Why is it on the left? All the other swingers have it in the middle, where it makes sense.
Extremely limited number of shutter speeds. Limited aperture settings - only to F11.

Positives? Super cool art deco design. The Dude uses one.

I much prefer my Horizon 202 and even more, the Noblex 135 series. The Noblex 135s do not band as they have an electric motor that brings the lens drum up to speed, maintaining consistency. Mine was serviced by Precision Camera Works who upgraded the hard rubber rollers to higher quality items (these control the drum speed).

I wish I kept my F7 and F8, just so I could sell them at today's going rates!
 

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
Why mess with xpan wannabes?
Why mess with abysmal distortion?

Ok, Jeff Bridges. But what about Madonna?
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
Why mess with xpan wannabes?
Why mess with abysmal distortion?


Tool for the job. The photographer picks depending on what is intended.

Horizon picked BECAUSE of the distortion:



Xpan picked BECAUSE did not want distortion:





The distortion is only evident if the camera is angled away from neutral (to a greater extent than regular cameras), but the flip side is that it has a much greater angle of view than an XPan - because the lens swings, and it is sharp from absolute corner to absolute corner because it uses on the center of the lens. Because it swings. An Xpan image will be softer to the corners. And suffers from vignetting unless you use the center spot filter. Which then causes you to lose 2 stops of light.

Noblex 135:



Crop from extreme corner showing no loss of sharpness or vignetting. Hand held. Cannot do this w an Xpan - would need a tripod:

 
Last edited:

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
Xpan, printed to 10”x24” shows extreme sharpness all the way to the corners.
I’ve shot around the world with the xpan and it is such a seamless camera that I would pick it over Leica, any day. It’s a workhorse. It is the standard. Nothing can touch it.

2ACEA688-6538-45E0-951E-758198D14771.jpeg
E2E2F090-DC43-4423-9B13-170AFDD1AC56.jpeg
02F9D1BF-5A6D-457C-A516-CBF1042B1536.jpeg
887BCC4C-7A3B-45E2-9D63-B1A6D98E98CD.jpeg
EA7481A0-4B19-4BF1-B49F-234FCE1E9460.jpeg
6CE87C08-5505-428F-BC75-A3AE17EA62CE.jpeg
D318FDCB-7FB9-45D6-9D5C-9AF4EB426F94.jpeg
5CCCC736-E871-4B9D-8288-CDC8E3AE134F.jpeg
CEC14349-5616-4280-A3AA-2C8F61BAA13B.jpeg
0CAC9947-51C2-4C68-B936-2697AABFF5AC.jpeg
10006964-A4A1-4180-8651-B32E3AD895E6.jpeg
4FEB8616-383E-40C6-9C60-FE0235E7350B.jpeg
57A22A8B-DFBA-4220-B6BB-CD32721936B9.jpeg
3575E86C-1F1D-4E12-9EC6-6448BF217699.jpeg
23F0FF79-94A6-4087-839C-103C7009DB61.jpeg
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I have a WideLux F7 with the filters. It works well. I will check it out and put it up for sale soon.
 
OP
OP

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,220
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Great replies and photos.....Thank You.
Kind of a fascinating topic
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
Xpan, printed to 10”x24” shows extreme sharpness all the way to the corners.
I’ve shot around the world with the xpan and it is such a seamless camera that I would pick it over Leica, any day. It’s a workhorse. It is the standard. Nothing can touch it.

Thing is, the Xpan was never asked about. But if you're going to Xpan, don't waste time with the 1, step up to the much improved Xpan-2..

:smile:

For the OP, you get the Widelux BECAUSE it is pretty cool as long as it works properly. Banding is a severe issue with these and there are very few places that are skilled enough to work on them.
Jeff Bridges' website has some very good tips as to how NOT to break one! I think he may also have some service tips.

But for $1000, $2000 or however much they are going for now, they really are not good cameras. They are art pieces that if working properly can make great pics.
Compared against their swing camera rivals, the Wideluxes come up way short. But if you want a Widelux, then that doesn't matter..
 
OP
OP

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,220
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Thing is, the Xpan was never asked about. But if you're going to Xpan, don't waste time with the 1, step up to the much improved Xpan-2..

:smile:

For the OP, you get the Widelux BECAUSE it is pretty cool as long as it works properly. Banding is a severe issue with these and there are very few places that are skilled enough to work on them.
Jeff Bridges' website has some very good tips as to how NOT to break one! I think he may also have some service tips.

But for $1000, $2000 or however much they are going for now, they really are not good cameras. They are art pieces that if working properly can make great pics.
Compared against their swing camera rivals, the Wideluxes come up way short. But if you want a Widelux, then that doesn't matter..
I WAS thinking about buying one. I had no idea how expensive they are.
They are not worth even half that much..... to ME.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,079
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
A friend who used one regularly with infra-red film would have his camera CLA every year.
 

Mike Lopez

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
640
Format
Multi Format
Go with a Noblex over a Widelux for the reasons noted above. You won’t have to trip the shutter like a trained monkey a hundred times to avoid the banding any time you want to use it.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
I WAS thinking about buying one. I had no idea how expensive they are.
They are not worth even half that much..... to ME.

The XPans really are spectacular cameras though. Fuji lenses are second to none, the ability to shoot between regular 35mm format and pano mid roll with the flick of a switch is unmatched. This is real pano, not a mask dropping down on the 35m frame.
They really are unique items. I had both the 1 and the 2, sold off the 1 mainly because it has an engineering flaw where the on-off switch wears out and gets harder and harder to use. There are no more parts made for it, and this IS a parts needed item. My Xpan1 definitely showed the onset of this, as compared to my identical but barely used TX-1 it was much rougher. When Fuji re-designed it as the Xpan2/TX2, they completely redesigned that switch, as well as adding stuff like exposure info in the VF.

Anyway, they are not swingers, etc.

Xpan:



Noblex 135:
 

tomkatf

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
289
Location
San Diego
Format
Medium Format
Had an F6B for a while in the '70's... Nice for some things... banding was a problem at lower speeds but disappeared at 1/125... Banaue rice terraces on Luzon...

banaue11w.jpg
 

Arthurwg

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,677
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format
Great book, shot surreptitiously with a Widelux: "Inside Algeria," by Michael von Graffenried, published by Aperture. Show what can be done with this camera.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
The Noblex 150 is far superior - and cheaper

Not remotely in the same category! I had one and sold it after 2 rolls because it is such a specialized piece of equipment. Huge. Only 6 exposures per roll. Huge. Unwieldy. Did I mention huge?
Upside - someone on this site bought it from me w/ no $$ loss to myself.
 

Arthurwg

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,677
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format
Nick Carver on Youtube has a recently posted write-up on the Noblex 150. But I will say Fatso has some great pictures here.
 

Paul Ozzello

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2004
Messages
618
Location
Montreal
Format
Medium Format
Not remotely in the same category! I had one and sold it after 2 rolls because it is such a specialized piece of equipment. Huge. Only 6 exposures per roll. Huge. Unwieldy. Did I mention huge?
Upside - someone on this site bought it from me w/ no $$ loss to myself.

Huge is good ;-)

These are 36” x 72” and could be even larger.
The sharpness of the Tessar lens in the Noblex 150 is outstanding.

98B1C7FD-6DC9-440D-A197-2BEB55793DD8.jpeg


Nick Carver on Youtube has a recently posted write-up on the Noblex 150. But I will say Fatso has some great pictures here.

Thanks Arthurwg :smile:
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom