• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Why would anyone do this to a Leica?

Grass

A
Grass

  • 1
  • 0
  • 4
Texas

A
Texas

  • 9
  • 1
  • 89

Forum statistics

Threads
203,435
Messages
2,854,633
Members
101,840
Latest member
Mayara Polizer
Recent bookmarks
0
You could buy it, use it everywhere, and never have to worry about scratches or dings.
 
I find it ironic that you complain about the camera's condition (about which only Leica snobnescenti will care) then say you are gonna wrap it in a hoigty-toighty leather case. C'mon man!

Dude, I hardly think a $45 aftermarket leather case is hoighty-toighty", and none of my Leica's have ever had one...and I'm
hardly a "snobnescenti", whatever the heck that is, although I applaud you on your colorful use of diction. I'd have made the
same post if it had been an FM2 etc. It's about the posey fakery of it that I find pretty retarded...the guy easily shaved $300-400
dollars off the value. Will I take advantage...well, shoot, maybe I will...
 
Last edited:
Snap-on wrenches are tools too (very expensive ones)...but you won't see mechanics treating them like that.

The big difference, in this case, is mechanics (especially if they make a living with their "Snap-On wrenches) respect their tools and try to take care of them. All "Craftsmen" do. I have seen Leicas that looked like this but looked that way due to honest toil and whose owners would send them in now and then to be recovered and repainted because they, too respected what they used to make a living with. In this case, if I had the money, I would have the Leica repainted/recovered to look like new (the insides are likely in new condition due to lack of use) and keep it until it wore out (from use) or I did.....Regards!
 
Dude, I hardly think a $45 aftermarket leather case is hoighty-toighty", and none of my Leica's have ever had one...and I'm
hardly a "snobnescenti", whatever the heck that is, although I applaud you on your colorful use of diction. I'd have made the
same post if it had been an FM2 etc. It's about the posey fakery of it that I find pretty retarded...the guy easily shaved $300-400
dollars off the value. Will I take advantage...well, shoot, maybe I will...

If I want to be a Leica "snobnescenti" (I like that word and I hope it applies to me) and if I want to be one, that is my business and anyone who doesn't like it can flat go live in the place of eternal fire if there is such a place. I am sure we have all met people who are "snobs" about the fact they don't have as much money as someone else.....Regards!
 
If the internet is any measure, most film Leicas are owned by Japanese people under 25 years of age. A beater with history can be a beautiful thing, especially if it comes with the right provenance, but artificially distressed Leicas are as dumb as pre-torn jeans, and much more expensive.

The motive is to avoid making the owner look like wannabe with too much disposable income. Instead it confirms that opinion and adds a comedy factor.
 
I did not know any M4-P had brass top plates?
Don't know what all the comments are about as it will take the same photos as a BP MP but accept IXMOO!
I sometimes tuck a M behind my back...
 
Here is the real deal...it was Elliot Erwitts Leica which had originally belonged to Magnum photographer Kryn Taconis. Erwitt had purchased it after Taconis passed, and it's now in the hands of Misha Erwitt.

6a00df351e888f883401b8d0dfaf50970c-800wi.jpg
 
I did not know any M4-P had brass top plates?
Don't know what all the comments are about as it will take the same photos as a BP MP but accept IXMOO!
I think that Leica moved to zinc top-plates somewhere during the M6 line...and yes, everyone, I realize it
will take photos just like a non-"aged" model...jeez
 
Here is the real deal...it was Elliot Erwitts Leica which had originally belonged to Magnum photographer Kryn Taconis. Erwitt had purchased it after Taconis passed, and it's now in the hands of Misha Erwitt.

View attachment 154686

I'd be a lot more inclined to want to purchase that M3 than that other abomination.
 
This is a rising trend in guitars, too. Even the most artfully aged ones where you really can't tell the difference miss the spirit of a battered, well used instrument. In my opinion...

I try keeping my guitars mint but they get proper wrecked. Wonder if that means it is worth extra... :tongue:
 
Dude, I hardly think a $45 aftermarket leather case is hoighty-toighty", and none of my Leica's have ever had one...and I'm
hardly a "snobnescenti", whatever the heck that is, although I applaud you on your colorful use of diction. I'd have made the
same post if it had been an FM2 etc. It's about the posey fakery of it that I find pretty retarded...the guy easily shaved $300-400
dollars off the value. Will I take advantage...well, shoot, maybe I will...

CDM, I didn't say you were a snobnescenti (I made that word up :smile: I am gifted like that) I am not fond of the Leica fondlers who think rare Leicas make them superior photographers. I find that ludicrous. I say if someone is looking down their nose at your Leica, shove it straight up said nose.

And snag the camera on the cheap. If someone is stupid enough to think rubbing sandpaper on their camera gives them status amongst the Leicaknobs then they are too stupid to need the extra cash.
 
I've taken sandpaper to gear to end up with a result similar to the camera in the first post in the past. The finish had gotten to a point that it was flaking off in small chunks, and I was getting tired of dealing with the random black specks, so I got a wire brush and some sandpaper and got rid of all the finish that looked remotely close to peeling.

I will admit that I had planned to refinish stuff... But honestly it still worked just as well as it did before, or technically better because it no longer left random spots on stuff after use, and if it isn't broken, then why try and fix it?

I sure won't deliberately add wear marks to something (With the exception of making props) but I won't turn my nose up at gear that someone else did it to if it is still in perfectly fine functioning shape. I rather doubt that I can find a single piece of camera gear that I own at this time that doesn't have at least some small sign of dings or scratches from use. I would prefer gear that is in good shape, and will take effort to fix things that need it, I'm not going to worry too much about how something looks if it doesn't have a negative impact on function. My C330 is rather worn on all the edges, all the knobs have scratches and dings, and there is a small dent on one corner that doesn't appear to impact the light sealing, and I honestly don't care about any of them because it is still a pleasure to use.
 
I think that Leica moved to zinc top-plates somewhere during the M6 line...and yes, everyone, I realize it
will take photos just like a non-"aged" model...jeez
Hi
You are correct only late M4-P had zinc top plates.
http://nemeng.com/leica/042b.shtm

Alas I don't see a problem with customising eg like replacing the covering with crocodile skin apart from being hard on crocs.

Or engraving social security numbers etc.
 
I don't know, they could just be a rough user or whatnot. I don't really think it matters what the body of the camera looks like as long as it functions properly, all that really matters is how well the images come out. The camera body is irrelevant unless you're just a collector or someone who wears their camera as jewelry but can't produce with it. Just my perspective, I would love to own an M6-TTL, but they are too expensive, I would love someone to beat the crap out of the body so that I could buy it at a discount :wink:
 
I would love to own an M6-TTL, but they are too expensive, I would love someone to beat the crap out of the body so that I could buy it at a discount :wink:

There was a recent ad on RFF in that the seller had one in otherwise very clean condition in which the internal meter did not work and would require a complete PCB board replacement. He was asking $650 and it disappeared in a day. Had I not already owned mine, I would have snatched that up in a split second because I don't even use the internal meter in my M6TTL, find the LED's too distracting so I took the batteries out.

Just say'n yo......
 
There was a recent ad on RFF in that the seller had one in otherwise very clean condition in which the internal meter did not work and would require a complete PCB board replacement. He was asking $650 and it disappeared in a day. Had I not already owned mine, I would have snatched that up in a split second because I don't even use the internal meter in my M6TTL, find the LED's too distracting so I took the batteries out.

Just say'n yo......

It's nice to have the option. I like having a TTL meter because I grew up on a Canon AE-1 and I basically "spot meter" my scenes which is harder to do with a RF and parallax-style meter.

To each their own. And again, I don't really have that kind of money to blow, but it would be a nice option to have as a carry around. Eh, maybe someday as a gift to myself when I make tenure or something :wink:
 
ask them to knock off another 20%. I'm sure there is a low enough price to make it brag worthy.
 
I don't know why people are getting so worked up. After all this isn't even a real Leica. It was made in Canada. CANADA fercryinoutloud!!!

Has anyone here bought maple syrup from Germany? But I digress..
 
I don't know why people are getting so worked up. After all this isn't even a real Leica. It was made in Canada. CANADA fercryinoutloud!!!

Has anyone here bought maple syrup from Germany? But I digress..
I'd pay a premium for that!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom