One big reason for me is being able to own and use all the great cameras that I could only dream of owning as a young guy. They were great 30 or 40 years ago and still are today
Hello LAG. Just back from my hometown and brought my 6d with me.Excuse me Marcelo Paniagua
Digital cameras have only one ISO (the "native" ISO, and not always corresponds to the "lowest" in the camera, and not always is available to the user) because there is a limit in the number of the photons for each cell, the rest is signal amplification. The size of each cell is what makes that limit (that ISO) for each sensor. The biggest the sensor, the biggest are (or can be) its cells, and the bigger the cells the more amount of photons he gets. Because is not the energy of the photons (that doesn't change) what marks the ISO, it's the number of them. When you increase (push) that signal (S) native number (and the ISO with it), you're creating/inventing a gain (taking new data) ... affecting the final result with electronic noise (S/N), lower colour quality, reducing the contrast range, bla, bla, bla those are the "extreme" digital ISO numbers. With that being said, you should know what are you doing when you select 102.400 ISO on your 6D.
Now, to answer your second question, my top film ISO so far was 25.000 (pushed from K. p3200) where 3200 was EI / and 1000 was the "native speed as starting point". That's why my "False" answer.
View attachment 167947
Hello LAG ... It depends greatly of the kind of scene but I think results are kinda usable.
At least, the thread had rekindled my interest on high ISO film (my favorite film ISO is 100). Getting some Delta 3200 this weekendRegards.
None taken LAGHonestly, no offense but I....
Kind regards
I like that expression... Random grain vs tiled through the bed under water.I made this short video (several years ago), months after a conversation with a friend of mine about all this
I like that expression... Random grain vs tiled through the bed under water.
The way I see it is:
Digital is all about the destination: to create high quality clean images for fast digital distribution for sharing on social media or commercial use. The end product is king.
Film is all about the journey: to use my experience to choose the film, filters, developer, paper and toner (for monochrome) to create a print that I can look at in a real form. The learning is the reward.
Both have their uses, but I know which one is more fun and rewarding.
... the journey ... the film ... The learning ... the reward
Print them and then compare them to darkroom prints from film. Only way to compare.
Sadly digital can easily look very sucky in print. Local pro round here shoots the coast and nightscapes using a D800, his photographs look amazing on the web but he had a gallery of prints setup in a restaurant and those same images looked pretty awful in print, really dull and lacking in impact. I am sure he could have worked on them more and used a better quality printer but this always seems to be the way with digital, it never looks as impressive as it does on a big graphics quality computer screen. Film the complete opposite.
Print them and then compare them to darkroom prints from film. Only way to compare.
Sadly digital can easily look very sucky in print. Local pro round here shoots the coast and nightscapes using a D800, his photographs look amazing on the web but he had a gallery of prints setup in a restaurant and those same images looked pretty awful in print, really dull and lacking in impact. I am sure he could have worked on them more and used a better quality printer but this always seems to be the way with digital, it never looks as impressive as it does on a big graphics quality computer screen. Film the complete opposite.
Sadly digital can easily look very sucky in print. ... Film the complete opposite.
You ever see digital projected? It really looks bad!
The 8K projectors are apparently quite impressive.
How is your wallet?
...If you want to use film go for it, but don't try to slam digital because you don't like it...
Sadly, film can suck in prints, too. I see them all the time.
OTOH, digital can look spectacular. One has to know what they're doing.
And bad is not bad in a good way.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?