Sometimes it is difficult to tell the difference between well thought out and lipstick on a pig. With respect to contemporary photography, I really don't feel qualified to make the call. I am mostly just puzzled.
One thing I have noticed is that a lot of contemporary photography is staged. For example, take the tableaux of Gregory Clewsdon, the head of the Yale photography MFA program we previously referred to. From what I read, he sometimes uses up to 100 assistants to set up the scenes. It seems to me the creative aspect is imaging the scene and then realizing it. Taking the photo is merely to document what he has created. I wonder if William Eggleston thought up that tricycle image, and then got a tricycle, set the scene up, and photographed it. I don't really know. Maybe it doesn't matter. The Pictorialists were hammered by Group F/64 for setting up those allegory scenes. Maybe some contemporary photographers are just Pictoralists reimagined.