• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up
  • Notice: Site bug fix updates in Loading.... Expect a 1-2hr outage. You can close this notice if you like. Thanks, Sean

why is it that you think 99% of photography isn't considered an art form?

Frozen Pool

Frozen Pool

  • 9
  • 6
  • 93
Greenhouse Volunteer

H
Greenhouse Volunteer

  • 3
  • 0
  • 69

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,408
Messages
2,840,307
Members
101,318
Latest member
Qixi_RS
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP

removed account4

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,810
Format
Hybrid
Maybe some contemporary photographers are just Pictoralists reimagined.

I don't think the Pictorialists ever went away. Photography has had an Identity Crisis from the beginning and I think it still does. And to answer my own question about why photography departments are segregated from the rest of the arts departments (at schools or in museums) I think it's because of the identity crisis. No one knows, especially these days, if it's graphic design or illustration or craftwork or painting or science or something else .. its just photography. No one really knows how to talk about it in relation to itself, its always in relation to something else that it's being put up against. I think once the great schism gets even bigger maybe photography and the people who practice it will know what it is.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,638
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Sometimes it is difficult to tell the difference between well thought out and lipstick on a pig. With respect to contemporary photography, I really don't feel qualified to make the call. I am mostly just puzzled.

One thing I have noticed is that a lot of contemporary photography is staged. For example, take the tableaux of Gregory Clewsdon, the head of the Yale photography MFA program we previously referred to. From what I read, he sometimes uses up to 100 assistants to set up the scenes. It seems to me the creative aspect is imaging the scene and then realizing it. Taking the photo is merely to document what he has created. I wonder if William Eggleston thought up that tricycle image, and then got a tricycle, set the scene up, and photographed it. I don't really know. Maybe it doesn't matter. The Pictorialists were hammered by Group F/64 for setting up those allegory scenes. Maybe some contemporary photographers are just Pictoralists reimagined.
Jeff Wall and Conceptual Art: https://gagosian.com/artists/jeff-wall/
Seeing many of his originals is really different than seeing illustrations on the web.
At one time he was one of the largest individual users of Cibachrome materials - the ones designed for backlighting.
In many ways, the Conceptual Art people are more like cinematographers than photographers.
 

faberryman

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,047
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
Jeff Wall and Conceptual Art: https://gagosian.com/artists/jeff-wall/
Seeing many of his originals is really different than seeing illustrations on the web.
At one time he was one of the largest individual users of Cibachrome materials - the ones designed for backlighting.
In many ways, the Conceptual Art people are more like cinematographers than photographers.

I was thinking more along the lines of considering photographs of Christo's fabric wrapped monuments and landscapes as the art.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom