There are some thesis to discontinuation procedures of Fuji! A couple of them are fromDespite the price it has a clean look and a low reciprocity failure than many long exposure photographers like. I had the impression it has always sold well. So why they discontinued?
To brake that rule normal market economy set a standard : competition rules !The law of profit-making:
As the demand for film goes down, the price of film goes up.
As the demand for film goes up, the price of film goes up.
As the film's raw materials cost goes up, the price of film goes up.
As the film's raw materials availability goes down, the price of film goes up.
As the film's price no longer creates profit, the film goes bye-bye.
What more is there to know?
Guess Fuji made much more profit from simple selling the Acros (with latest pricing)Acros is a wonderful film, but considering how much competition there was - tmax, Delta, Adox, etc, and declining profits it did make sense to slash it from a financial perspective. They probably have employees aging out and it is all a part of their master plan to exit film. Nobody knows what happens behind the gate of the chocolate factory but don't be surprised to see the rest of their films get axed soon. Stock up on slide and colour negative is you like it.
Let's better say Fuji had restructured complete company from business model ! And from thisThe available evidence suggests that Fuji are unable to downsize their film production...when they do a coating run it's a big run or nothing. Kodak have stated that the process to reintroduce Ektachrome involved making some changes which have resulted in them having the ability to do shorter runs...thus making both Ektachrome and P3200 viable again. Part of Ferrania's plan for long term production also involves flexibility in terms of how much film they produce at any given time.
Fuji were probably just not selling enough Acros to use up whatever quantity they need to produce before it expired. While Acros may well have had unique properties there are a lot of medium speed B&W films out there.
It may depend on which film they run out of first.Their E6 products will be the last to go, because they are virtually unchallenged in that sector. My guess is 400H will be next on the chopping block.
Their E6 products will be the last to go, because they are virtually unchallenged in that sector.
My guess is 400H will be next on the chopping block.
Does Adox make color film?Adox also have the ability to produce smaller batches of film/master rolls than Fuji are. Ergo Adox's ability to survive in the shrunken market is better. Fuji, being Japanese, just aren't open and transparent about their decisions in this area. It's a cultural thing we pretty much have to accept.
If you want to continue using Fuji film....buy it.
Does Adox make color film?
They have said they potentially could - if necessary. Ilfochrome was latterly a 17 layer construction & the coater in Berlin is ex-Agfa, so both could potentially be used for colour products. Really more a question of how many machine passes would be needed & the availability of the relevant emulsion making experience.Does Adox make color film?
That is interesting. Indeed unlike other manufacturers Fuji seems uncannily mysterious in how they are managing the smaller market and scaling.Unlikely - I heard from someone who has a sufficiently close relationship with the manufacturers to be told this sort of stuff - that some of the Fuji negative products were at sales levels not seen for 20 years.
Adox said they can make color but all that know how and supply of components is very complex and they say that would be far from what Kodak or Fuji produce. And even if they can access Agfa knowledge, it may not be that useful at this stage.
I’d rather they bring back Acros, but any new film would be welcome.
The last thing we need is yet another ISO400 B&W film.
Filling a gap in the market (ISO 200/800/1600) makes much more sense.
Because I was not shooting enough of it.
The last thing we need is yet another ISO400 B&W film.
You might be right but the resurrection of Neopan 400, once an existing film, might be easier than devising a new 200 or 800. OK there was once a 1600 as well but I wonder whether the market for such remains big enough to justify the investment.Agreed. Kodak TMY-2 is an incredible product and there are plenty of less expensive options as well.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?