The only thing I can say is the quality of my camera (Contax G2) largely exceeds my skills as photographer.
Who's the Greatest
-
A
- Thread starter ColColt
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
Want to Buy Pentacon Six, Kiev 60 or equivalent camera body
- Started by blee1996
-
Want to Buy Body Caps and/or Lens Adapters to Olympus Pen F (FT, FV) Camera
- Started by loccdor
-
For Sale Vintage Bolex H16 Catalog
- Started by davela
-
For Sale Reflecta 35mm Plastic Slide Frames - 100 Count - New
- Started by davela
-
Sold Gordy Camera Wrist Strap
- Started by davela
Forum statistics
The best built film 35mm camera ever made was the Alpa. I had seen Alpas off and on over the years, then last year a friend of mine wife inherited an 11e with 3 lens. He sent it to me to check it out as they were thinking of selling it. Odd camera, not the most modern in terms of design, the build quality is off the charts. I have had many fine quality cameras, Nikon, Canon RF, Leica, Kodak Retina III C big, in terms of build quality and quality of the lens, I don't know of any better. Having said that it is odd to use, did not come with a electric motor drive, (I have seen pictures of a all mechanical drive, very strange). The lens quality is so good that they kept the camera and bought an adaptor to use the lens on Sony mirrorless camera. If I had the money I would not buy one, just too odd to use.
A another post on Rollei promotional matches reminded of another system I keep forgetting, the Rollei 2000, 3000, I have never seen a Rollei 2000 or 3000 let along shoot with one, but as I call it quite the system in the day. In the past folks have claimed that it was the Rollei 2000 that did Rollei in, never made any money with it, could not recoup the investment. Had bodies, backs, drives, huge range of Zeiss lens.
The Leica M cameras are not even in the same league as most 35mm cameras. They're in a different bracket all together, AFAIC. What I had in reference to was the normal cameras most folks buy, Nikon, Canon, Leica R, Pentax, Minolta, etc. The kind of cameras most can afford.
To an earlier question, I think the only F2's that had leds(dots) were the non-AI F2SB and the AI F2AS.
To an earlier question, I think the only F2's that had leds(dots) were the non-AI F2SB and the AI F2AS.
So what you are saying is by greatest you mean run of the mill great. Like asking what is the greatest car, but don't think about the really good ones, just Fords and GM.
The F2 is a very good camera, but not as good as a F3 or F3 J, or a F5, or Pentax LX, or Canon New F1, or any other of a handful of good cameras.
As Joanne Nosuchinsky says, "let the market decide". 
As Joanne Nosuchinsky says, "let the market decide".
Then it is most likely a disposable.
It may or not be the greatest but the F2 is definitely my favorite.
Nikon F2 + 18mm lens by Narsuitus, on FlickrAs Joanne Nosuchinsky says, "let the market decide".
Well they always said that the best camera was the one that you have with you. For most people that would be the Iphone.
I'd much prefer the F2 myself.
I had an F3 and the F2AS. Sold the F3, the F2 is better to me.
The Canon New F-1 is better than those.
The old F-1 is better built than all those. The Leicaflex SL is probably even better built but it's not a better "user" camera than the New F-1.
I have not used or seen a Pentax LX.
With all said, I'd say that either a Contarex or a Rolleiflex is better built than all the above cameras.
Alpas? I guess Alpas are great if you like running 10 miles with stilleto shoes on.
The Canon New F-1 is better than those.
The old F-1 is better built than all those. The Leicaflex SL is probably even better built but it's not a better "user" camera than the New F-1.
I have not used or seen a Pentax LX.
With all said, I'd say that either a Contarex or a Rolleiflex is better built than all the above cameras.
Alpas? I guess Alpas are great if you like running 10 miles with stilleto shoes on.
Last edited by a moderator:
My beauties, Canon and Nikon.
I came real close to getting the old Canon F-1 back in the late 70's I guess it was. I think what prompted me to go Nikon was the name and the fact the first one I saw was at the PX in Frankfurt around 1966 when I was stationed close by. It was the FTN Photomic, best I recall, and I lusted after something I knew a SP-4 couldn't afford. I told myself when I got back to the world I was going to have one...I did. You can see where the back leatherette has come loose but I shot a lot of good pics with that camera.
Looks like one or two F2SB's in that fine group.
Horst Frass and Henr Huet also shot with Liecaflex and Contaxt. The Air Force, Army and Marines started with Nikon in the early 60s as the F was the first out of the gate with a complete 35mm system camera, once invested they stayed with the system. The Navy did comprehensive testing and picked the Topcon SuperD and Canon F1 and new F1. In my time in Southeast Asia the Air Force and Army shot with Nikon as did AP, UPI, the Europeans shot with Nikon, but also Liecaflex, the freelancers shot with Nikon, but I also saw with Spotmatic, Petri, Merandia, you name it if it worked they used it. As a Air Force photographer I used M2, M3 and Fs, as a freelancer and with the wires I shot with F, F2, and F3 J. The F3 J was a better camera camera than the F2, had hot shoe, weather seals, and a faster motor drive.
Other than the fact you own an F2 what is your data to show that the F2 was better then the Pentax LX, Olympus M4,Canon F1 or for that matter the T90? What makes the F2 a better camera than a F5, F6 or EOS 1V or Minolta 9?
Just F2S's. Note the Nikkor 28-45; a beautiful lens.
I could have sworn I saw pictures of those guys with a Nikon F around their neck...no matter. The F2 doesn't need an introduction nor does it need me to stand up for it. It's longevity and reliability speaks volumes for itself since it's introduction. I doubt you'd find a combat photographer, photojournalist or anyone that made their living with the camera with a Pentax or Minolta around their neck. I've never seen one. Sure, they all work. You can get from point A to B with a Volkswagen or you can go with a BMW.
Bold statement there. Pretty sure most pros would use what every camera fit there needs best regardless of brand if they are not endorsed.
Since I'm left handed. I have to say exakta vx iib/a is one of the best. It is a bit odd but I love it.
I came real close to getting the old Canon F-1 back in the late 70's I guess it was. I think what prompted me to go Nikon was the name and the fact the first one I saw was at the PX in Frankfurt around 1966 when I was stationed close by. It was the FTN Photomic, best I recall, and I lusted after something I knew a SP-4 couldn't afford. I told myself when I got back to the world I was going to have one...I did. You can see where the back leatherette has come loose but I shot a lot of good pics with that camera.
You should have gone to the Canadian PXs in Zweibruken or Baden-Baden in 1966. I went there as a PFC & bought a new FTN for $95! A year later I bought a new M4 for $164! (and 5 new M lenses from 21mm to 135mm, and I was only a SP4!!!
Quite a deal. According to one internet site (*), $95 in 1966 is $701 today; $164 in 1967 is $1170 today.
(*) http://www.dollartimes.com/calculators/inflation.htm
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |