I did some experimentation with cold toner paper developer formula a few years ago and came to the conclusion that some of the controls advocated in texts are not that effective with modern papers; standard D-72 seems like a good choice for a cold to neutral tone results.
Yes, I've had the same issue, except with warm tones. This is part of why I'm interested in new formulas.
I haven't done so much experimentation in the other direction as I have found the ID-78 formula works well, and which I think should work in a similar way to the Harman Warmtone liquid concentrate, along with a few other commercial products.
Yes, I've had the same issue, except with warm tones. This is part of why I'm interested in new formulas. The formulas of old do not work on modern materials like they did with the legacy stuff. I'm not sure what changed exactly, but it's a fairly big difference. The only modern paper that I can get good results from with some of those older developers is Fomatone Warmtone Classic FB, which is great, but I never want to be limited to a single paper type.
I experemented with 'black salt' to replace sulphide toning with apparently good success.I'm curious who out there (other than me) is creating new formulas for film and paper work. That includes developers, fixers, toners, even alt process stuff is interesting. I've not found many new formulas made in the past 10 years and wondering if formulation is just not interesting for people, or if there's a ton of hidden gems out there. So pitch what you've made and why it's worth trying out! Doesn't necessarily even have to be a brand new formula, could just be a moderately modified formula that suits your needs better. (only thing not that interesting is like, adding 1g extra bromide to Ansco 130 or something)
About 7-8 years ago, I worked diligently to invent a two-part concentrate that is long lasting, yet gives image quality comparable to XTOL. Here's my article about it:
https://www.photrio.com/forum/resources/mocon-xtol-quality-in-a-long-lasting-concentrate.219/
My bottle is 7 years old now, kept frozen the entire time, and still shows no signs of deterioration/oxidation. I last used it a month ago, and it gave the same leader-density as XTOL.
As a low-volume user, I love it, but most people would dislike it because (1) creating the concentrate requires that you mix ingredients into hot propylene glycol, and (2) to use it, you must measure out the correct amount of concentrate (liquid) and sodium sulfite (powder).
Mark Overton
I experemented with 'black salt' to replace sulphide toning with apparently good success.
Lee Lira and I (mostly Lee) are working on a developer for silver gelatin dry plate ambrotypes. This is black glass coated with one of my emulsions and shot at ~ASA 32. Developed in Lee #2 test developer.
View attachment 263842
What exactly is the key to getting the ambrotype effect as far as development? I've gotten it a few times with experimental developers on ortho litho film and it's rather fascinating (though with film it never quite looks bright enough to me, can't get the backside dark enough). Key factors I've observed is under development and slight under exposure... but I never did enough with it to really know what would actually be an ideal developer for the effect.
Oh that's fascinating. They're a pain to mix but I love concentrate developers like that. I definitely need to try that since the large volumes of xtol (and Kodak's recent quality problems) have been a turn off, but a one shot concentrate I'm all about. I also had no idea metaborate was soluble in PG, will definitely have to keep that in mind. I keep around a 10% solution of sulfite for various things, so that parts easy. Not a fan of weighing liquids (prefer volume even if it's less precise) but either way, seems I could just add some extra PG to make it easier to measure out. I don't understand how you got 4g of ascorbic acid into 12ml of PG though, unless the metaborate makes it more soluble. Using a PG temp of around 65C and maybe 45 minutes of stirring (thank god for magnetic stirrers) I was barely able to make an 8% solution of ascorbic acid in PG. The solution was remarkably stable though, I mixed it about a year ago, it's in a half empty bottle without much care, not refrigerated or anything but still seems about as active as the day I mixed it with no discoloration, gas release (ascorbic acid likes to decay to CO2) or anything. One question about your concentrate though, has it been observed to lose activity with more lazy storage methods or are you just taking precautions? And does it discolor or anything when it starts to go off?
Has anyone tried ascorbic acid based paper developers? e.g: http://home.alphalink.com.au/~simgrant/jackspcs/pde72.htm Hydroquinone has become more expensive and less available in the UK in recent times.
Ryuji Suzuki, who used to post here, devised some ascorbate developers including print developers:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070720203755/http://silvergrain.org/wiki/Silvergrain_formulae
You can buy PF-130 from Photographer's Formulary, which is the same formula as Ansco 130. Have you tried it?I remember these, I think I tried mixing one of the print developers but it didn't have the shelf life he indicated, likely due to using Phenidone rather than Dimezone. I don't recall anything special about the results, but I'm always in the search for an Ansco 130 style developer that can be used for months
Yes Ansco 130 is just the older potentially trade marked name for the formula they publish. I mix it from raw chemicals rather than buying a kit. I highly recommend it either way, it's an excellent developer. I'm currently testing a developer that might give similar results and tray life without the hard to source (internationally) glycin componentYou can buy PF-130 from Photographer's Formulary, which is the same formula as Ansco 130. Have you tried it?
Also, they publish its formula, so you can mix it yourself if you wish. I haven't tried it, but the stock solution supposedly keeps for at least 6 months.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?