The special developing process at the WhiteWall photo lab turns your artistic black-and-white photographs into high-end baryta prints. First, the cutting-edge laser exposes your image onto the photo paper. This is followed by traditional silver halide developing, fixing, and washing.
I wonder if anyone has more info about this process? Is this a routine procedure commercially, or is it relatively rare?
Thank you all - @Carnie Bob - what is a Lambda exposing unit and where can I read more about those?
@Nitroplait that thread is really helpful. I am preparing an order for a few baryta prints. I am uploading 4000dpi scans from a few 35mm and 120 black and white negatives in .tiff format processed & exported in Gray Gamma 2.2 and will order a few 20x30cm test prints. I have deactivated their post-processing as you suggested in your post. I will report back. This might be what I've been looking for.
Get in fast as most labs with lambda are replacing with high end large format inkjet.
(which in my opinion are indistinguishable from each other anyway)
Media choice in particular plays a major role for inkjet, so does to an extent ink setting. And then of course calibration/linearization, toning etc. Don't let anyone fool you into thinking B&W inkjet printing is necessarily easier than wet printing if you want to produce an excellent print. Inkjet is a whole lot easier if you want to produce a decent print that will be satisfactory for the great majority of people. If you aim for the top segment, both inkjet and silver halide are on the interface of science, magic and craft.Would they be distinguishable from a wet print of the same negative? Or do, for the three methods, (lambda,inkjet,wet print) operator's skills play a strong role, too?
It will not be the same paper, let's get that out of the way. There are inkjet baryta papers and silver halide baryta papers. They're different. Longevity of the inkjet prints will depend on esp. the specific paper used, the ink set, any finishing layers applied and storage conditions. For silver halide baryta prints it's an equivalent series of factors. The long & short of it is you can't say that either inkjet or silver halide will last longer as long as you're comparing high-end prints. In the lower segment, silver halide baryta basically doesn't exist to begin with and inkjet can be hit & miss, depending.Also - durability - would there be significant differences in durability across the three provided they're printed on the same baryta paper?
A similar kind of paper that you'd use in the darkroom, just a fixed grade fairly high contrast; see @Carnie Bob's response above. After processing I don't think you'll be able to tell the difference with a regular Ilford darkroom paper.which type of baryta paper would be used for the 'laser' process advertised by the company I linked to?
Thanks
Would they be distinguishable from a wet print of the same negative? Or do, for the three methods, (lambda, inkjet, wet print) operator's skills play a similarly strong role?
Also - durability - would there be significant differences in durability across the three provided they're printed on the same baryta paper?
You're right; this is where the real difference is made w.r.t. archival stability. I assume this is automated and that the wash cycle is therefore on the minimal side esp. for fiber-based paper.I would be curious how they post exposure process the paper as it does make a differnce
I see they claim a 75 year lifespan on their bartya prints, this is telling to me as I have made prints on a lambda in a couple of scenerios, they are using a Lambda or Lightjet in both cases laser exposure. We now know that silver prints if processed right have over 100 year lifespan because the proof is right before our eyes in our grandparents folios. So I suggest that 75 years is wrong , unless of course they are using a all machine process method which in the beginning 2006 many labs did which IMHO were not properly fixed and started staining in some cases. In my case I only used the Lambda setup for exposure and through hand process applied the proper Ilford sequence to my prints. I visited last fall a lab in New York which did it exactly the same way as I did and was very happy to. see that. Griffen Editions in Brooklyn. I would be curious how they post exposure process the paper as it does make a differnce . I supect its not hand process and I can assure you the final stages of process cannot be properly maintained unless they have superhumans watching the process and slowing down the machine for proper fix.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?