Dan Rainer
Member
Dan,
TF4 is a great fixer and I've heard no complaints about its performance. Are you thinking of going with a rapid fixer with hardener to prevent the slight scratches in the corner of that shot? I don't think it makes any difference much as to what fixer if you accidentally scratch a negative. A harder will only go just so far. Nothing wrong with TF4 and I'd stick with it.
The small scratch in the corner is from the hanging clip. I'm not too concerned with it, but the possibility of foaming/bubbles is more worrying. I'm using a Mod54 adapter with a 3 reel/1 liter Paterson tank. I've tested to make sure 1 liter actually covers all the film. The sheet in question was not dislodged or shifted out of position. It was the only sheet showing this issue.I see something that looks like held-back development due to foaming/bubbles, possibly associated with the sheet not being submerged well during part of development. There's also some scratching near the corner.
I might have missed it, but what kind of tank and adapter are you using specifically?
I started using the twizzle stick in response to air bells with 120. I typically use it for the full first minute before a few solid taps on the base. If this mottling is bubble/foam related, it's much much different than the first round. The markings are less distinct and only seem to effect a single sheet. As for inversion, I was trying to find a middle ground between solid agitation and being gentle to avoid dislodging the sheets. They're just held in with tension and sometimes shift if the inversions are too intense.Do you invert the tank during the first minute?
Only using the twiddle stick never gave me clean negs with a Paterson tank. I would first use the stick for a few seconds, then attach the lid and invert for the rest of the first minute, and then whack the tank against the table several times. (Actually against som EVA foam after cracking one of my tanks)
Could it be that your agitation scheme is a bit too gentle to dislodge the air bubbles?
Was this neg developed with a drop of Photo Flo in the pre-rinse?
I intentionally avoided using PF this time in an attempt to troubleshoot one element at a time. Now that I can tell that the presoak is indeed very helpful, I'll add PF on my next round. If that doesn't work, I'll try varying my agitation scheme as you suggest.
I have had very faulty Arista 100 before, but I thought the issues were limited to 120. I'll try shooting some Ilford with a similar processing method and compare the results.Looks like bad film. Not sure how one could reproduce that on good film.
