Which Nikon?

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 4
  • 0
  • 53
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 2
  • 2
  • 54
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 51
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 7
  • 5
  • 204

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,819
Messages
2,781,313
Members
99,716
Latest member
Thomas_2104
Recent bookmarks
0

dana44

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
103
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
Yea, Looking into getting a Nikon... But which one? I hope to get something an Auto-exposure setting so I can play with the aperture without worrying about fussing with the exposure and messing up rolls of film.


So which Nikon should I get... And what's the best lense for it?
 

Soeren

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
2,675
Location
Naestved, DK
Format
Multi Format
Hmm AF, MF or the best of both? Whats your subjects? How good are your eyes? Whats your pricerange?
For static things you Come a long way with manual focus so the FE and FM line will do. Some swear by the F3(HP) which has interchangeable wievfinder etc. The HP finder is larger and brighter so its easier to work with.
I have a FE2, F90X and a F100. The finders in the AF bodies are much better than the FE2 finder so they are easier to focus manually too. The AF is quite fast in both F90X and F100 though faster in the F100. So the FE(2), FM(2(N)) or an AF body like the F90X or F100 would be my sugestion. Some say the F100 is the best film body ever made. As For lenses see this site.
http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html. Which lens to choose depend on you choice of subjects but a good one could be the 50mm prime ( Im not into zooms)
Cheers
Søren
 

Soeren

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
2,675
Location
Naestved, DK
Format
Multi Format
Just checked your posts. Why another camera? Why not use the ones you got already and make some pics? :smile:
Cheers
Søren
 
OP
OP

dana44

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
103
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
Just checked your posts. Why another camera? Why not use the ones you got already and make some pics? :smile:
Cheers
Søren



Took the Canon back... it broke, Needed the money to.

The Kalimar died.. The shutter got broke.. The Minolta.. well, it's MIA.
 
OP
OP

dana44

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
103
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
Hmm AF, MF or the best of both? Whats your subjects? How good are your eyes? Whats your pricerange?
For static things you Come a long way with manual focus so the FE and FM line will do. Some swear by the F3(HP) which has interchangeable wievfinder etc. The HP finder is larger and brighter so its easier to work with.
I have a FE2, F90X and a F100. The finders in the AF bodies are much better than the FE2 finder so they are easier to focus manually too. The AF is quite fast in both F90X and F100 though faster in the F100. So the FE(2), FM(2(N)) or an AF body like the F90X or F100 would be my sugestion. Some say the F100 is the best film body ever made. As For lenses see this site.
http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html. Which lens to choose depend on you choice of subjects but a good one could be the 50mm prime ( Im not into zooms)
Cheers
Søren


My eyes are good, I like AF.. but can use MF. My subjects vary.. most of the time i am doing portraits... So I want a decent zoom lense with good aperture so I can get the Focus FX I want.. (Ex: Person in CLEAR SHARPNESS, and the background blurred)

I am usually outdoors... so a flash really isn't needed, but would be great.

Price range?? Hmm.. I really don't want to spend no more then $300
 

Soeren

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2004
Messages
2,675
Location
Naestved, DK
Format
Multi Format
If you want limited debth of field you need a fast tele, something like a 85mm 1.8 (2.0 will do) for portraits, a 135 f/2.8 wont be a miss either,
or the 180 f/2,8 and If you have the money and can find one the 105 f/1,8.
That should fullfill your tele needs. You probably still want something with a wider angle so the 50mm (again) and a 28mm either the 2.0 or the 2,8 AIS (20cm focuslimit) gives you good image quality. A package with either of the 28mm's the 50mm f/1.8 and a 85 or 105mm and the FE2 or FM2 is light compact and good quality. My first Nikon was the F90X and I quickly added up so I had a 24mm(Sigma) the 50mm and a 105(Sigma macro) although the Sigma were quite good they didn't give the image quality of similar Nikors.
I now have the 20, 50 and 85mm AFD Nikors and though I miss a 28mm they do almost everything I want from them. I'd recommend you stick with a three glass kit for liteness and ease of operation.
Cheers
Søren
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
[
I am usually outdoors... so a flash really isn't needed, but would be great.

Price range?? Hmm.. I really don't want to spend no more then $300[/QUOTE]

A N 8008 with standard mid range zoom, 28 to 80 will under $300.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
[
I am usually outdoors... so a flash really isn't needed, but would be great.

Price range?? Hmm.. I really don't want to spend no more then $300

A N 8008 with standard mid range zoom, 28 to 80 will under $300.[/QUOTE]

You can also add N 65, 75 or 80. All seem to be dirt cheap at the moment.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
249
Location
Norfolk, UK
Format
Multi Format
You can also add N 65, 75 or 80. All seem to be dirt cheap at the moment.



Probably because they are about due to expire?

An FE2 with a couple of reasonably fast prime lenses should do what Dana44 wants – NOT a zoom as even an expensive one (one that will more than blow your budget) will only give a max aperture of f2.8, plus a whole load of distortion...

I find AF cameras hard to focus in manual mode due to the plain screen. This especially a problem with wider angle lenses. Come to that I'm not overwhelmed by their capability in AF mode either.


Richard
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Probably because they are about due to expire?

From I read at Nikon the only film camers still in production are the FM 10 and F6, which is the reason that they are very inexpenisve.

It seems that a FE2 body alone is about $250, add a couple of primes and you are well over $300.

I dont like AF much myself but a good clean N 75 or 80 is a lot a camera for the money.

On the other hand a Nikormat with non AIS lens will last forever.
 
OP
OP

dana44

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2006
Messages
103
Location
Georgia
Format
35mm
Probably because they are about due to expire?

An FE2 with a couple of reasonably fast prime lenses should do what Dana44 wants – NOT a zoom as even an expensive one (one that will more than blow your budget) will only give a max aperture of f2.8, plus a whole load of distortion...

I find AF cameras hard to focus in manual mode due to the plain screen. This especially a problem with wider angle lenses. Come to that I'm not overwhelmed by their capability in AF mode either.


Richard

You and me both... I hated using my Canon in MF mode... I prefer to have a MF camera body.. with an AE setting if thats even possible...
 

Jim McD

Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
55
Location
New Hampshir
Format
Multi Format
N90 and N90s have been on several websites lately for $125 or so. It is a terrific camera with more capability than you may ever use. It is well constructed. You can go from fully manual to fully automated, with a bunch of places to rest in the middle.
 

snegron

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
806
Location
Hot, Muggy,
Format
35mm
If you want to hold off and "splurge" a bit more, consider the F3. Solid construction (will probably still be around years after the last roll of film is sold on ebay), great ergonomics, very accurate metering. I have purchased a few great F3HP's at KEH.
 

copake_ham

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
4,091
Location
NYC or Copak
Format
35mm
Actually, I think this "Which Nikon Should I Buy?" thread comes up about every 9.3 days!!!!

Couldn't the OP have done a site search first and have discovered all that has been said, and all that will be said in this particular thread?
 

film_guy

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
258
Location
Canada
Format
35mm
Why not get a F100? From what I heard from my Nikon buddies, it's one of the best modern Nikon bodies available, and they're cheap too since everyone's getting into digital nowadays.
 

Thanasis

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
391
Location
Sydney, Aust
Format
Medium Format
I dont like AF much myself but a good clean N 75 or 80 is a lot a camera for the money.

On the other hand a Nikormat with non AIS lens will last forever.

I cut my teeth on the N75 (or F75 as it is known here) and it is a great camera. You can get one 2nd hand very, very cheap these days. The only problem is that it's a little small and bit plasticky and the metering selection is a bit convoluted in the various modes.

Stop me if you've heard this one before, but the F5 is still me favourite 35mm SLR ever! Really good AF, flexible metering options (matrix, spot, centre weighted)). Drawback? No matrix metering with AI lenses. :-(
 

Seele

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
194
Location
Sydney Austr
Dana,

if you look at it from a different viewpoint it could be another one of those thousands of "which one should I get" threads, where each reply is like "this model works for me so get it" etc.

But to be realistic, you need to ask some basic questions.

Why Nikon? It might be the "reputation", or the perceived final product quality, etc. But you have to think in terms of the sustainability of your tools: viability in tems of expansion and repair, how well you can use it as a tool, etc.

Then you have to make sure you can stick to your requirements: very often you get something that suits your requirements and them a week later you say, "wouldn't it be nice if it had that function?" and you're back to square one. I see this every other day, and it can get very frustrating too.

My advice (after several false starts)...

Get the camera with the minimal feature you can live with, which is sustainable. In that sense it seems like a FE or FE2 would be quite sufficient. There are differences between these two models, and operation-wise I actually prefer the FE. But of course keep an open mind, YMMV.
 

timeslicer

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Messages
13
Location
Kent
Format
Medium Format
Nikon FA with a 105 f2.5. Beautifully balanced and relatively lightweight. Top quality, and now thanks to digital very inexpensive.
 

Snapshot

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
913
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
I owned/own an FE, FA, F801 (N8008), F90x (N90s) and F100. Although the F100 was technically the most advanced and durable of this cameras, I really enjoyed my F90x the most. Considering the cost of picking one of this units is very inexpensive, they are now the best deal in town.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Seele

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
194
Location
Sydney Austr
So it's been said that Lens & Shutter of Vancouver BC had a huge stock of new FM10 cameras late last year; just a thought.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom