Which Leica M?

Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
One last thought. Congrats on your M2.

The M2R would be my second choice. The M2s are very pretty.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5098.jpeg
    416.9 KB · Views: 46
Last edited:

Pieter12

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
7,613
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8
The only downside to the M5 is it cannot use collapsable lenses and others that would interfere with the meter arm inside the body. But there are plenty of lenses that do work with it, so it is not really that much of a limiting factor.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,254
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format

Complete agreement on everything said here with a minor niggle about the finish. I love the black chrome matte finish on mine.
Good to know DAG has a parts supply, thanks for that info.
And concerning collapsing lenses, of course you can use them on the M5- just use them extended! That’s what I’ve done.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
I use a 1956 Summicron 50/2 collapsible on the M5. Its a fantastic lens due to its handling, size, and classic rendering. The key is to find a clean one and its just as good as the rigid between f/2.8-f/4 progressing through the smaller apertures.
 

radialMelt

Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2022
Messages
247
Location
Canada
Format
35mm RF
The finder as crisp as a MP I once owned.

I have to disagree with that! The modern day viewfinders are far superior to the old ones. It was the first thing I compared when I had both an M5 and a 2021 MP at the same time. That isn't to say the M5 viewfinder is bad or anything - its a lot better than many other cameras of that vintage.
 
OP
OP

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,353
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format

I may buy one of those because someone here told me you're supposed to own multiple M bodies
 

Dali

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
1,858
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
Every Leica M is OK as long as it can be repaired.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
RadialMelt

When I got my DAG overhauled M5 back with a cleaned viewfinder I compared to my 2001 purchased new MP. The M5 was a hint less bright but also seemed to have a hint more contrast. Basically one would not see any meaningful difference. I’m very sensitive to finders.
 

Pieter12

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
7,613
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8
Some non-collapsable lenses cannot be used, either:
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
You can’t meter in camera using those optics with the M3/2/4 series.

Its good general information for people thinking about which M to buy.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,368
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
You can’t meter in camera using those optics with the M3/2/4 series.

Its good general information for people thinking about which M to buy.

Well the issue with the 21 and the listed 28mm & any collapsible lens that is mounted fully collapsed is that the back of the lens will break off the meter stalk.....
 

250swb

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,530
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format
I may buy one of those because someone here told me you're supposed to own multiple M bodies

This is true, but often because people buy the wrong one in the first place. There is some strange fascination people have for the M3 and then they find they'd really like to try a larger variety of lenses, and maybe they feel a meter would be good, so along comes another Leica. This way they can pull their braces out and claim on the forum's that the M3 is the best camera ever, while being glad of having an M6 as 'backup'.

As a long term Leica user I've bought every model M often more than once except for the M5 where I've had none. The only M I wouldn't buy again, after buying and selling three, is the M3, too limited for my use (and the M2 is better), and the best bang for buck is the M4-P.
 

BorHa

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
38
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format

Leica m4 is the best in my opinion. The slanted rewind lever and no removable film spool a pretty big deal in terms of time savings. If you plan on ever shooting 28mm, the m4-p is a great option. Anyone who has an m5 loves it. I thought they seemed big but I love the shutter speed dial. Good luck on your M journey!
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
I love the over-hanging shutter. The size fits my hands. The finder as crisp as a MP I once owned.

I need to make a correction. The MP finder is brighter and easier to focus in dim light. In outdoors light I did not see any meaningful difference in finder contrast /brightness between the MP and M5.
 
Last edited:

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,533
Format
35mm RF
M2
 
OP
OP

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,353
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format

So, since the time I first posted the question, I managed to squirrel away the money to buy both a just-CLAed M2 and an really nice 50 Jahre M5 (now with DAG for overhaul). I'm using the M2 a bunch right now and I love the thing. Because there were only 1750 of that particular M5 made, I told myself I could justify my M5 jones because it's collectable, you know ...
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,533
Format
35mm RF

What lens are you using on the M2?
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,533
Format
35mm RF
I have an older collapsible 50mm f/2 Summicron, a 35mm f/2 Summicron M, and a 90mm f/2 Elmarit M

The 50mm f/2 Summicron is a beautiful lens. I have only used a 90mm on my M2 for a few shots, but also a great lens.
 
OP
OP

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,353
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format
The 50mm f/2 Summicron is a beautiful lens. I have only used a 90mm on my M2 for a few shots, but also a great lens.

It's a great lens I just had mine CLAed to improve how it handles specular highlights, but this 1955 version of the lens does interesting things when you point it at a bright light source:





The CLA calmed some of that down, but in very bright direct light like this, there is still some evidence of reflection off the aperture blades. I would imagine a modern Summicron M would probably do better because of superior internal coating. But, of course, that's not the usual shooting situation so I don't much worry about it.

I just did this with it (scan of silver print):



I also love that I can use that lens on both my IIIf and M2 (and soon, M5).
 
Last edited:
  • Nikon 2
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Empty
  • Nikon 2
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Offtopic

dave olson

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
163
Location
Nevada
Format
Medium Format
Reference DAG working on M5's, you best check with him. Seems I read a year or two ago that he has stopped working on the M5. The problem is parts availability. There are some other service people but again parts. I would suggest either an M4-P or an M6 (not the reissue)The M6 meters through the lens. On the M4-P you can use a VC meter or similar attached in the shot shoe.
 
OP
OP

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,353
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format

DAG just overhauled my M5 50 Jahre including recalibration of the meter for 1.5v batteries. So, yes, he's still working in them.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…