Benjiboy is right. Talented photographers have been making fine photographs for 177 years, often with primitive equipment. Untalented photographers can at least make videos of themselves crushing their gear.
A Kodak 35 would probably damage the press.I, for one, would like to see this done to an Argus C3.
Anywhere from a quarter of a milliom to over 3 million views of each video. He is making money.Why would you want to do this?
intelligence has limits stupidity and waste don't.This video proves which is actually the better brand.
still,this test is senseless and proves nothing.Oh, come on you people -- lighten up. Either of those cameras could be had at the local fleamarket for $20.
I have a friend who used to sell cameras in LA who said the Leica dealer would take the top shell of an R4 and put it on the floor and stand on it to prove how tough it was -- zinc, I think. In any event, that makes more sense than expecting anything other than amusement value out of this stunt.
That bledTec guy is in Utah -- hey, a UTAH product. His ads, for a while there, featured him blending a lot of odd stuff in the company's industrial-strength blender. Very funny.
Why would you want to do this?
I would be sad if I saw even a Zenit treated like that.
The C3's bakelite body will bounce right back into shape, with only minor scuffs.I, for one, would like to see this done to an Argus C3.
The C3's bakelite body will bounce right back into shape, with only minor scuffs.
How about a thread of youtube videos microwaving digital cameras?
Dare i ask the Obvious Question.....??Most ridiculous thing I've ran across. I didn't even watch it.
Anyone recall the Timex commercials with John Cameron Swayze?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?