- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 78
- Format
- 35mm
This question is so vague as to be totally pointless.
Although not as pointless as your response.
Also that Bradley guy speaks of owning a second body... WHY!?!?
Maybe that Bradley guy has the money to own more than one body? Actually, this André guy is seriously thinking to have 2 more swedish cubes, why? Well, because he wants, and also to mount his 3 lense set, without the need to unmount the optic when a switch is required! It's confortable to reach the full set ready and fire away...
Cheers
Bodies are cheap, and it does not matter how reliable they are if they get stolen, dropped off a cliff, lost etc.
Don't they usually take a lens, back and finder with them?
Better have two of everything then !!
Let's not get all angry... I was making the point to the OP that feeling the need for two bodies is premature and not as important as lens selection and an extra back. I don't venture two days into the backwoods, and I suppose I might have 2 bodies in that case, I hiked the Rockies last year and I pared my system down to a 50mm, 80mm extension tube, 500cm, 2 a-12s and a D300 and do-it-all zoom, and tripod... and I was beat hauling that with water in a backpack.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?