Which (DIY) developer for pictorial portraits + FOMA 100?

Chiaro o scuro?

D
Chiaro o scuro?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 204
sdeeR

D
sdeeR

  • 3
  • 1
  • 235
Rouse St

A
Rouse St

  • 1
  • 0
  • 262
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 3
  • 2
  • 297

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,197
Messages
2,787,712
Members
99,835
Latest member
Onap
Recent bookmarks
0

olk

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Messages
105
Location
Germany
Format
Medium Format
Hello,
which developer do you recommend for pictorial portraits (of course using a soft focus lens) and FOMA 100?
I've access to bulk chemicals:
  • p-Aminophenol HCL
  • p-Phenylendiamin
  • Pyrogallol
  • Catechol
  • Glycin
  • Metol
  • Dimezone-S
  • Hydrochinon
A rich tonal range is preferred over sharpness. Maybe a staining developer is better suited for FOMA 100?

ty, Oliver
 
Last edited:

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,440
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
which developer do you recommend for pictorial portraits

Frankly, I would focus on other things than developer choice. It'll have a marginal effect anyways. There are several factors that do have a profound influence that are far more worthwhile spending time on: conceptual approach behind the portrait and/or building rapport with the model, posing, composition, lighting - all factors that make a world of difference. Choice of developer: a 0.002% difference and any opinions you'll get will vary by a mile and they'll all be 'correct', since the experience is mostly subjective.

Having said that,
Maybe a staining developer is better suited for FOMA 100?

I quite like Fomapan 100 in Pyrocat because it tends to mask the grain somewhat and I find the tonality (whatever the heck that means, objectively) pleasing. I've developed quite a bit of it in D76 some years ago and found it horrible because of the runaway highlights it gave me. Rodinal gave poor shadow detail and coarse grain. 510 pyro had the tendency to give uneven development and I found the tonality (LOL) not as nice as pyrocat. No doubt if I now tried any of those combinations again today, I'd feel different about them. There you go; make of that what you will. If it doesn't help much, remember the first part of this post - that's the part that actually has any significance. The rest of it is just herp-derp sounding interesting and tossing names around, if you're critical.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,319
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
I've used Fompan 100 (or the rebranded version, .EDU Ultra 100) in Dektol 1+9, Parodinal 1:25 and 1:50, HC-110 dilutions F, G, and H, Xtol replenished stock, Df96 monobath, and D-23 replenished stock. As noted by Koraks, the differences are at a level of subtlety I can't discern, aside from the sharpness of grain in Parodinal and Dektol vs. the more solvent developers. If you're mixing your own developer anyway, I'd suggest D-23, as it's by far the simplest -- just the three ingredients (one of which is water).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom