Which developer for APX100 (new)?

Farm to Market 1303

A
Farm to Market 1303

  • 0
  • 0
  • 357
Sonatas XII-51 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-51 (Life)

  • 0
  • 2
  • 612
Lone tree

D
Lone tree

  • 3
  • 0
  • 513
Sonatas XII-50 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-50 (Life)

  • 2
  • 1
  • 3K
Tower and Moon

A
Tower and Moon

  • 4
  • 0
  • 3K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,740
Messages
2,795,965
Members
100,021
Latest member
oinkmoo32
Recent bookmarks
2

colinh

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
3
Format
35mm RF
Hello everyone,

I'm getting disappointing results from APX100 developed in Rodinal 1+50. HP5+, FP4+ and Acros are all quite nice (the grain doesn't bother me) - just the APX100 has awful grain and tonality.

It's very odd. I thought I'd read it described as "creamy".

I used the Rodinal datasheet's recommendation of 17 min (reduced due to processing at 22.5 deg C). Agitation as described in the datasheet. I made up the developer in 300 ml distilled water (ie. 6 ml Rodinal). I know they claim there should be 10 ml or more, but everyone reckons this is an exageration - and it works fine for the other films...

Any ideas?

My other developers are SPUR Nanospeed UR (only for SPUR Orthopan UR film - beautiful!), Ilford DD-X (I'm trying to move to developers with a slightly longer life), Rodinal 1+50, diafine (incredible results so far with HP5+)

Thanks,

colin
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,286
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
That's very strange Colin, I've always had excellent grain & tonality with APX100 and Rodinal at 1:50. In fact the combination gives outstanding results, I used 35mm 120 & 5x4..

But I'm sure that for my normal development I developed for a lot less than 17 minutes, more like 10 or 11.

The only reason I stopped using APX100 was when it was no longer available in 5x4 as I prefer to stick with one film for all formats.

Ian
 

Uhner

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2006
Messages
1,100
Location
Oslo, Norway
Format
Multi Format
I have not used APX 100 for several years now. But back then I developed APX for 10 to 12 minutes in Rodinal 1+50@20C. 30 seconds of initial agitation and two gentle inversions once every minute. That gave me very good results.

I usually find that AGFA’s development instructions for slow and medium speed films in Rodinal are way to hot for my liking. In their defence they do, however, state that their times aim for a contrast of 0.65…
 

Fotohuis

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
810
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Wrong time, overdeveloped in Rodinal!

Use for APX100 (new)/Rollei Retro 100 (so APX100 production run 2005) the following Rodinal times:


Dead Link Removed

E.I. 80 10:00 min. is the optimum for 1+50 Rodinal. Use slow agitation, first minute continuous, then every 30S 2x slow.
R09 1+40 will give slightly denser negatives and more grain with the same developing time.

Best regards,

Robert
 
OP
OP

colinh

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
3
Format
35mm RF
Yes Ian, I thought it was strange too, but from Uhner and Fotohuis it looks like the development time is waaay out. But I definitely read that the emulsion had been changed and is supposed to require longer development ie 17 minutes - according to the Rodinal datasheet. OK, I'll try 10 min :smile:

As it happens, I'm just scanning my first APX100 (EI 200) in diafine. And, yes, it looks better than my APX100 in Rodinal 1+50 !!!

I'm starting to like Diafine...

colin
 

Fotohuis

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
810
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Indeed, the Rodinal times on the sheet are wrong. A&O (the new owner of the Agfa chemical plant in Vaihingen/Enz), will correct them in their new data sheet.

Diafine works especially fine with HP5+, Neopan 400/1600, Tri-X(400):
http://www.fotohuisrovo.nl/documentatie/Diafine_Acu-1_BKA.pdf

More information about the interesting Rodinal developer you can find here:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/rodinal/discuss/72157600245966695/

and if you're interested in a test Rodinal versus (Fomadon) R09:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/rodinal/discuss/72157601393747142/

Best regards,

Robert
 
OP
OP

colinh

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
3
Format
35mm RF
Thank you very much Robert!

Very interesting / useful information.

So, developing for 13 minutes at 23 deg C (reduced from 17 min at 20 deg C) would not be expected to give good results :smile:

I'm looking forward to trying it for 10 minutes at 20.0 deg C!


colin
 

Fotohuis

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
810
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
So, developing for 13 minutes at 23 deg C (reduced from 17 min at 20 deg C) would not be expected to give good results

Rodinal development over 22 degrees C will cause exessive grain, which is typical for each para-amino phenol developer. Try to keep your Rodinal developing temperature between 19-20 degrees C. For 19 degrees you have to compensate for just a bit LONGER developing time according the regular temperature compensating table.

Best regards,

Robert
 

Snapshot

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
913
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
I use APX routinely (having a significant stockpile) and I can concur with the other comments that your development time is too long. Try 13 minutes with Rodinal and see if the results are better. Rodinal, however, will do little to mask APX's grain, as it is more pronounced that T-Max or Delta. Nonetheless, APX will give you great sharpness and excellent tones.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom