Which developer better to use for expired film?

blossum in the night

D
blossum in the night

  • 1
  • 0
  • 33
Brown crested nuthatch

A
Brown crested nuthatch

  • 2
  • 1
  • 52
Double Self-Portrait

A
Double Self-Portrait

  • 7
  • 2
  • 146
IMG_0728l.jpg

D
IMG_0728l.jpg

  • 7
  • 1
  • 108

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,714
Messages
2,779,690
Members
99,684
Latest member
delahp
Recent bookmarks
0

dmtry

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2011
Messages
37
Location
Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
Hello here.

I have few exposed rolls of expired Delta 100 and HP5+ (2007)
Which developer and agitation time you can suggest for such film development and why?

Thanks!
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
Assuming the films were not stored in a car trunk (boot) in a hot climate there should be no need to do anything different.
 

agfarapid

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
195
Location
New England
Format
Multi Format
I can't speak for all films but some time ago I developed baby photos of my daughter who is now 26! The film was (now discontinued) Verichrome Pan and the developer was HC 110 dil b. The results were a lot better than expected. I used the normal development time for that film/developer combination. There was some fog and reduced contrast but the result was an easily scannable negative. Try Ilford's recommendation for HC-110.
 

winger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
3,975
Location
southwest PA
Format
Multi Format
For film that recent (2007 really isn't that old), using your normal development should be fine. I've recently shot some poorly stored Tri-X that expired in '96 and it was fine with my usual developer. For truly old film, HC-110 usually gets the nod.
 

johnielvis

Member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Messages
966
Format
Medium Format
hc 110 does work well, but I've found recently by experimenting that a paper developer will produce way less fog than hc-110. I compared hc110 and ilford pq universal and found that hc110 produced fog on paper very quickly, where the pq universal took quite a while before the fog began to develop. So I'm thinking if you have two rolls please continue the experiment. try some hc110 and also try some pq uinversal (which is also a film developer) and compare the two. See if you get less fog with the pqu.

I also experimented with film. the hc110 did produce more density more quickly than the pq universal. but I couldn't detect fog from either...it was fresh film so the only way to get fog is to let it go a long long time--both of them will get the fog eventually. hc110 likely much faster though.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
i use ansco 130
it is like dektol but with some glycin in it ..
130 is a mix your own developer, and i have a feeling
you won't be able to get glycin in the ukraine
dektol works well too with fog .. ( from what i hear )
1:7 7mins, or 1:10 10 mins ..

i only shoot expired film, some of it 10, 20-30 years old..

your actual mileage may vary though

good luck!
john
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom