Where to find a good used scanner?

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,356
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Look for manufactures such as HP or Epson selling reconditioned scanners. Those are new ones that had a problem, were returned, repaired and fully tested, for a lot less money and a shorter warranty.

Personally I am using a new, not reconditioned, Epson Perfection V850 Pro.
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
2,193
Location
Mars Hill, NC
Format
Multi Format
I don’t think anyone ever asked you how you intended to use the scanner in your workflow. I assumed that if you were scannng 4x5 film, any scanner would give you plenty of information.

Your interest in preserving the top end of the grayscale might have a bearing on the right solution for you but that is beyond my knowledge, and any possible improvements from a flatbed, such as an Imacon, would be much more expensive.
 

Paul Verizzo

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
1,643
Location
Round Rock, TX
Format
35mm

Many of us have more time than money.

I don't know how many product reviews I've read over decades where the reviewer advises to opt for the better model or whatever "Because it is worth it." Not knowing the reader's finances. And, of course, they were supplied the product for free.
 

Beverly Hills

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2023
Messages
193
Location
California
Format
Medium Format

.....that's a B-25 Mitchell - right, seams it was stationed in south Italy - right too?
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,444
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

I found the 4x5 holder to buy separately.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,444
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Yes, I just found a V750 that seems promising and I bought it. Is the holder necessary for 4x5? Couldn't that be scanned directly on the glass?

Not arguing, just curious

Use a holder as it uses the better lens for scanning. If you use the glass, the scanner will select the second more inferior lens.

The holder mentioned in my last post has a height adjustment. Try it on each of the settings to see which is the best height and gives the clearest most focused scan. I marked mine with a marker afterwards for easy reference as the sliders move too easily out of their settings. Set all four adjustment sliders to the same height.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,444
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

That was me circling around.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,444
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

Adrian did give the option recommending that if you have an iron clad deal to return the used scanner if there are problems, then do it that way. But the point he made was that scanners in particular can be easily damaged when moved or shipped and go bad over the years. You don't want to buy someone else's headache.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,444
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,444
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format

Beverly Hills

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2023
Messages
193
Location
California
Format
Medium Format
Don't have access to the scans at the moment but I don't recall it having Kodachrome on it. I remember seeing a lot of "SAFETY FILM" on them as apparently film was prone to being flammable back when.
...I see : NITROFILM of course....have a nice day Les Sarile
 

grat

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
2,044
Location
Gainesville, FL
Format
Multi Format
Specification wise, the 700/750 800/850 are all *mostly* the same. The 7xx has cold cathode for lighting, whereas the 8xx has LED, so there's less warmup time. The 8xx series has different holder compared to the 7xx series-- in general, they hold fewer negatives, and have ANR "glass" on them. They also have more height adjustment steps. The 8xx series medium format holder is a bit of a pain because the tabs that hold the ANR material in place make it difficult to get the 120 film "just right" in the holder. But it does a better job of holding it flat.

Rumor has it that the 750 and 850 have slightly better coatings on the lens-- but I haven't found anyone who can confirm that.

Note that all four scanners have two scanning modes-- a "high resolution" lens (6400 PPI) that is supposed to be focused +3mm from the glass, and a "low resolution" lens (4800 PPI) that is focused on the glass bed. I forget the steps on the 8xx series holders, but I think they're about 0.2mm-- and yes, that much delta in height does make a difference in sharpness.

You won't get 6400 or 4800, but cut those numbers in half, and you'll probably get pretty close. I find that some sharpening always benefits. Personally, I prefer a technique called "Frequency Separation" that allows finer control over whether you're sharpening the overall image, or just the details.

To the OP, if the seller hasn't shipped yet, insist that they ensure BOTH transport locks are engaged.
 

Larryc001

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2022
Messages
122
Location
Western
Format
Multi Format
Is a new v600 at $348 cdn worth looking at?
 
Last edited:

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,627
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format

Captain McLain has his 45 in a shoulder holster
 

JerseyDoug

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
385
Location
Jersey Shore
Format
Medium Format
Is a new v600 at $348 cdn worth looking at?

Having used both a V700 and more recently a V600 I see no difference in my 35mm or 120 scan results. The big difference is that the V7xx and V8xx can scan four strips of 35mm, two strips of MF, or a full 8x10 transparency, while the V600 is limited to just two strips of 35mm or one strip of MF.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2023
Messages
18
Location
Calitalia
Format
Medium Format
Hi porpho, I have a 4990 that I was thinking of putting up on eBay as I'm not using it. I've moved on to DSLR scanning as I shoot 35. Fair price shipped etc. PM me, I guess, a conver etc. I don't want to hijack your thread.
Kevin
 

removedacct2

Member
Joined
May 26, 2018
Messages
366
I'm definitely stoked about not needing the holders. I'll post here my experiences.
the topic for holders or not, and what kind is a source of infinite discussions. I scan anything from 120 to 8x10.

i ended up using two sheets of optical quality glass custom cut. Right now i am scanning 120 in 6x9 and took this shot. Each sheet is 3mm thick. I found 3mm to be the minimum in order to sandwich films and sheets flat. You can see four white pieces each side of the glass. These are papir pads.
There are tons of discussions: on the bed or adjust height, etc. What I know and that may be related to the specifics of this exemplar of the model, is that I made a LOT of tests, padding gradually by adding/removing layers of paper, AND with both Vuescan settings "transparency, 8x10 transparency". That padding was the one giving highest resolution. That may not be the case for another exemplar of the scanner. So it means optimal focus in my case is a bit over 3mm. But then you see: native holders are certainly not needed. I have two sets of 4x5 holders (dual: two 4x5 sheets each) and i did check/test the adjustment of their feet also. Sometimes i use them sometimes not. There are also the discussions about Newton rings caused by the glass. In that setting of mine I have not yet had the issue.




 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…