I agree that if one only uses technique and not creativity the photographs will be stiff, stifling, and boring. However if only creativity is used, many of the photographs will suffer from lack of proper exposure, focus, development, printing, ...
what i am gettting at is that for some people it is sheer technique...
and for some it is not.
one problem with forum threads like this is people who are technique driven
get all bent out of shape and visa versa .. if one is happy with their results, whatever works works ..
i certainly don't care if someone makes photographs without a map, or if the whole thing is an excercise of the hinge theory
but there is a point when it is subconscious and not a technique..
and that is what i was getting at .. is there a specific time or instance where this happens.
However if only creativity is used, many of the photographs will suffer from lack of proper exposure, focus, development, printing
South Mimms Servicesjnaniaiananan said:where does technique end and creativity begin ?
In Pollack's case I think they are correct. Vastly overrated painter who simply came up with that strategy because he could't draw. Anyway, his wife. Lee Krasner, was a better artist. and actually had the ideas that Jackson stole. Anyway, he drank too much and put his car into a tree.How many times have you heard people say regarding a Jackson Pollack painting, "Any idiot could just as well splash paint on a canvas."
Wonderful.robert delpire, famous french publisher and photographer, said, in comparison to the artisan's (handcraftsman) work, the artist's photograph has the "I" in it, "...and it is so cumbersome that you cannot get around it..."
nicely said in my opinion.
In Pollack's case I think they are correct. Vastly overrated painter who simply came up with that strategy because he could't draw. Anyway, his wife. Lee Krasner, was a better artist. and actually had the ideas that Jackson stole. Anyway, he drank too much and put his car into a tree.
its all about having fun so it really doesn't matter what words are made and what the "outside world" thinks..Exactly why I wish terms like "art" and so-called "creativity" didn't even exist. These are very plastic words which can mean almost anything.
maybe .. but i think he used a paint very close in chemical formation to urinol,
Exactly why I wish terms like "art" and so-called "creativity" didn't even exist. These are very plastic words which can mean almost anything.
For me, creativity is a way of life and media and technique are just a way to exercise it. I believe there is a vast amount of inate creativity in most people. They just have never learned or been given an opportunity to develop it,( or in some cases don't care to.)
composition is technique and has nothing to with creativity
To begin with, photographers see differently than most folk. Next, the way they access that understanding is quite different, too. And finally they may produce their visions in a way that others might not have considered. In all of that there is a certain purity of thought and a subsequent agility that avoids the average.
You will hear people say "She's really creative", a reference to doing something differently and creating an event that lives on its own.
In Pollack's case I think they are correct. ... Anyway, he drank too much and put his car into a tree.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with those terms... as long as you are willing to accept them as loose concepts and don't attempt to quantify them. Similarly, you can't measure such things as love or beauty. Although they exist only as ideas, they do have meaning and value in communication.Exactly why I wish terms like "art" and so-called "creativity" didn't even exist. These are very plastic words which can mean almost anything.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?