Where are lens boffins when U need them??

The New Dawn

A
The New Dawn

  • 6
  • 0
  • 102
East 10th Street

A
East 10th Street

  • 4
  • 0
  • 98
Ganleys Bend

A
Ganleys Bend

  • 9
  • 1
  • 124
Juan de Fuca

A
Juan de Fuca

  • 4
  • 1
  • 255

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
184,412
Messages
2,562,308
Members
96,065
Latest member
Jason Abraham
Recent bookmarks
2

Tom Stanworth

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2003
Messages
2,022
Format
Multi Format
Hi,

No insult intended. I posted a question about that famous photo of Ansel A, Moonrise. In his notes he stated that he advanced the focus by x amount to take account of the single component of his cooke lens at f32 (or words to that effect). I would love for somebody to explain what he was talking about and whether one would have to 'compensate' for different apertures using single element of the new very expensive and much applauded Cooke XVa triple convertible. If it does apply and nobody knows about it, there will be a lot of blurry images being produced by these lenses:smile:
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,906
Location
Honolulu, Ha
Format
Large Format
I guess he was compensating for "focus shift" when stopping down, which is a characteristic of some lens designs.

"Focus shift" is a bit of a misnomer, because it seems to suggest that the focal length of the lens changes as it is stopped down. What's really happening is that as one stops down and spherical aberration is corrected, the point of sharpest focus might appear to change. If I'm using a lens that is considered to have focus shift (like a Dagor, for instance), I might check focus at an intermediate stop and the shooting aperture to be sure.

As to whether the new Cooke convertible exhibits focus shift--I'd ask over in the Cooke thread on f32.net, since Barbara Lowry monitors that board, and there may be one or two folks who actually own the lens and can report back.
 

Alex Hawley

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
2,893
Location
Kansas, USA
Format
Large Format
Quoting from "The Negative, page 127, "I focused and composed the image rapidly at full aperature, but I knew that because of the focus-shift of the single lens component, I had to advance the focus about 3/32 inch when I used f/32".

And that's our Gospel quote of the Evening.

David's explanation is spot on. Adams was compensating for the focus shift that he knew occurred due to the change in spherical aberration.

This example also illustrates just how adept Adams was at handling his equipment. He also states that these adjustments were done intuitively. So was the exposure setting and he rattles of a luminance number for a full moon that he uses to calculate the exposure at f/32. Regardless of whether he ran through all these numbers at the time or whether he filled them in when writing the explanation, it still shows there is a lot to be said for being familiar with one's tools, so familiar that it becomes intuitive.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom