A few things come to mind in my life at this particular time:
I permanently loaned a Canon Sureshot 35mm P&S to a friend, and gave her a bag of frozen consumer film that I have had in my fridge for years. She has been making her way through the film, but told me she wanted to shoot black and white. So, I went to Freestyle yesterday and got her a roll of BW400CN to try out. The roll is almost shot already.
I gave a 10-minute presentation (with one-page handout) on A.P.U.G. to two college photo classes.
I mix up special chemicals for the experimental photography class, and encourage their use.
I encourage students to make their work rely on the physical and active nature and routine of making analog work. It is a huge conceptual difference between film and digital, IMHO; the physical act of actually making the work. Results rely largely on the details of ones process, and the physical acts of how it is carried out. IMHO, working in analog makes the process an ever present part of, and contributor to, the work, while digital is more results oriented, and only about the work alone, damn how it got there, and damn how the process affected the concept.
I give people film as gifts, especially when they say something like, "I have an old camera I used to shoot, but I didn't think I could get film for it any more", or "I used to love the way my old pictures on film looked so much better."
I help people organize and care for their scattered and abused photo archives, and I print and/or copy peoples' old photos for them.
I help people set up darkrooms. I loan them and/or give them equipment and materials.
I find good, cheap film equipment for people.
Rather than answer a question, I try to inform a person enough to answer it his/herself. I encourage reading, experimentation, testing, practice, and anything else that involves teaching people to teach themselves. Encouraging actual thought and critical thinking generally also encourages analog methods, IMHO.
I always take my time to explain why analog is better to those for whom it really is better, especially to intelligent people who will listen to what you have to say. I have surprisingly had decent success, especially with those who do not consider themselves "serious photographers."
I tell people they are lazy and stupid and unskilled when they speak of "going" digital (that is, abandoning film after learning on film).
I make fun of and start fights with people who tell me they had to entirely abandon film to met their clients demands, saying, "I have to feed my family."
I speak of film as if it were not dead. I try to put forth the attitude that it is an outstanding imaging tool that we have at our disposal, so we should use it.
The only way to save film is to get people to buy it. Plain and simple. We have to use it or lose it, and we obviously cannot do it with the current numbers of film shooters. We need new users to adopt film, and adopt it in force. We need new users who learn on film to stick with film. I try to get these things to happen with whoever I know.