Well, £10 a sheet isn't as bad if you don't then have to pay as much or more to have it processed. Since I do my own C-41 and replenish the color developer, it'll cost me less than a dollar to get to a negative. Actually, four sheets 4x5 for less than a dollar. I very much like Portra in 120, so I presume I'll like it in 4x5 as well. Tax refund coming up, might grab a box or two of Portra when it comes in.
Let us know how the Foma 400 goes. Ive only used it in roll film, not a great film to use, but may be ok for LF. EDU 100 was ok except it usually required an hour long exposure in good light when using my 8x10 pinhole camera.
.
Thats a great picture.Donald, I don't know if you have tried the Shanghai. I got a bunch of it for 8x10. It does not have the long tonal range of HP5 or T-max, but for many situations it works very well, for example overcast light. I have my 8x10 film holders loaded with it now.
This 11x14 print is from a shanghai negative.
View attachment 270872
Needless to say I have vastly over estimated how much film I'll be shooting
Large format tends to be more contemplative, rather than "shoot a whole roll and hope for two or three keepers." On the other hand, if you really want to spend more money on film and processing, you could look into getting a couple Grafmatics. You can make six exposures in about half again the space of one double dark slide, and (if you want) go through all six in a minute. They were great for press photographers, back when a Speed Graphic, fedora, and cigar were the uniform. Not a major step up for landscapes and architecture, I'd say, but they do make it easier to carry more film. Two Grafmatics is a good day of shooting with a view camera...
then got the lab bill and decided I should probably pace myself a bit or I'd have to sell one of the kids to pay for it all..
Hp5 for me. Went threw about 150 sheets last year, mostly handheld with the speed graphic. A normal day when I take it out is 4 sheets handheld. The cost is about the same if i use 4 sheets of hp5 or take out the medium format and use a whole roll.
The one I did get to expose developed to an image but 75% of the emulsion fell off, leaving only a spot in the middle.
I hate when that happens...
Donald, I don't know if you have tried the Shanghai. I got a bunch of it for 8x10. It does not have the long tonal range of HP5 or T-max, but for many situations it works very well, for example overcast light. I have my 8x10 film holders loaded with it now.
This 11x14 print is from a shanghai negative.
View attachment 270872
Plenty of reviews claiming Shanghai GP3 is the worst film available, as well as the cheapest (this may apply in only certain locations; here, either .EDU Ultra or Ultrafine Extreme usually get the "cheapest" honor). That print suggests that, as with other "worst film I ever used" statements, it's usually a matter of expecting the wrong thing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?