My favorite is the Rollei 35. While I still have to bring it up to eye level to shoot, thus notifying the subject, I preset it at waist level. Then, the shot is so fast and quiet, I bring the camera back down again, pretending to be fiddling with it. Or, I try to look around the subject, as if they had just obstructed my shot. I like Delta 400. Shot at 200 on bright days, 1600 on dim days.
Lastly, an AF SLR with a nice zoom; 28-105 or 35-135. These are REALLY fast, compared to the Rollei 35. Much as I like the little Rollei, I miss fewer shots with a proper AF SLR rig.
For night work I like a point and shot with fixed 38 to 45mm 2.8 with Tmax 3200, I develop as a +1 push. For daylight, zoom point and shoot with Tmax 400.
This is a great plan. Not sure about the zoom P&S, as they have crappy lenses compared to the early prime-lensed ones.
Hear me out here. Try not to laugh.
Just about any TLR can work well for street photography.
The problem with rangefinders and SLR's and almost anything else (and I do use them all) is that your subjects respond differently when they feel that a camera is pointing at them. You may see them looking right into the lens, building tension. So then you end up with a lot of intense looking photos where the subject is looking into the camera. Do you then take photos of people from behind? From far away? Just to get that candid moment.
With the TLR, navel-gazing into the chimney viewfinder from above, it's not so threatening to subjects. You don't look like you're about to take a photograph, and most folks will tend to just go about their business.
I took this with a Mamiya C330. But really any TLR with a chimney viewfinder should work fine. I'd love to get into a Rolleiflex someday.
TLRs are a double-edged sword. On one hand, a lot of people tend not to pay much attention to you. On the other hand, some people want to chat about the old-fashioned camera a bit too much. As for Mamiya vs. Rollei (flex or cord) the Mamiyas are more versatile, but not at all compact, compared to a Rolleiflex. On the negative side is that they have very limited depth-of-field, compared to 35 mm, so snapshots aren't as easy.
For street photography, I want a camera that is easy and fast to use. I most often use a wide lens, prefocus and set exposure, then point and shoot--many times barely lifting the camera to my eye (and sometimes just from chest level) as I pass the subject.
https://pdekoninck.cargo.site/Street
Great tactic.
View attachment 237531
Really, it’s whatever you are comfortable with and shoot quickly with. I Have found that for me, it’s a fixed lens rangefinder or SLR with a wide prime. However, I’ve never understood the reason behind a waist level finder. If it’s for stealth reasons, I don’t agree. There is no reason for stealth or sneakiness in street shooting. Just shoot with whichever rig you are quick and comfortable with.
Have you ever shot in a city in which subjects are more aggressive and hostile, feeling like they have a right to privacy, even while in public? There's also the capturing candid moments aspect, which is damned hard to do when we alert them to our intent by raising a camera to the eye.