I would agree with the old man, the objective is to make a good picture you and others can appreciate. The lens has more relevance than the camera, but the operator is by far the most important aspect of equation.From the following quote, we can guess that he would not approve of all this thought put into gear:
"Constant new discoveries in chemistry and optics are widening considerably our field of action. It is up to us to apply them to our technique, to improve ourselves, but there is a whole group of fetishes which have developed on the subject of technique. Technique is important only insofar as you must master it in order to communicate what you see... The camera for us is a tool, not a pretty mechanical toy. In the precise functioning of the mechanical object perhaps there is an unconscious compensation for the anxieties and uncertainties of daily endeavor. In any case, people think far too much about techniques and not enough about seeing."— Henri Cartier-Bresson
This little bit is maybe akin to the people shooting brick walls nowadays:
"He started a tradition of testing new camera lenses by taking photographs of ducks in urban parks. He never published the images but referred to them as 'my only superstition' as he considered it a 'baptism' of the lens."
I remember another forum use to have a "post your duck picture" thread for when you got new gear.
If you say Seagulls are included then I will go with that....there are people there, but are blurred out, so I get both blurred people and birdie shot in one.
Nikon f2 and 105mm.
