What's the use of stock solution?

Orlovka river valley

A
Orlovka river valley

  • 0
  • 0
  • 48
Norfolk coast - 2

A
Norfolk coast - 2

  • 2
  • 1
  • 51
In the Vondelpark

A
In the Vondelpark

  • 4
  • 2
  • 125
Cascade

A
Cascade

  • sly
  • May 22, 2025
  • 6
  • 6
  • 107
submini house

A
submini house

  • 0
  • 0
  • 78

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,832
Messages
2,765,181
Members
99,484
Latest member
Webbie
Recent bookmarks
1

Paul.

Member
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
306
Format
8x10 Format
Have to say I am with Stephanie,

Got hold of 35 liter packs of ID11 weighed out the powers for 1 liter stock mix, never not no problems. OK the purists frown but it worked for me and I would do it again without concern.

Regards Paul.
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
The problem was with fresh D76 having a pH of 8.3,
at which point the hydroquinone is essentially inactive.
Over a few months the pH rises, to up to 9, activating the
hydroquinone. .... With time, the original D76 formula
changes character and becomes a hotter developer.

A hotter developer over time, that is why borax was
added; to maintain a more constant ph. Kodak's most
recent D-76 uses a borax blend which includes boric
acid for even greater ph stability. The cause of ph
instability, hydroquinone and it's oxidation.

Without the hydroquinone there is NO reason to include
borax. Leave it in or leave it out, you'll see no difference.
With 100 grams of sulfite and 2.5 grams of metol the
developer is a wastefully LOADED with sulfite 1/3
strength D-23. Dan
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,281
Format
Multi Format
Without the hydroquinone there is NO reason to include borax. Leave it in or leave it out, you'll see no difference. With 100 grams of sulfite and 2.5 grams of metol the developer is a wastefully LOADED with sulfite 1/3 strength D-23. Dan
Got it. I'll ring up Mr. Haist straightaway and tell him he doesn't know what he's doing.
:munch:
Lee
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
Got it. I'll ring up Mr. Haist straightaway and tell him
he doesn't know what he's doing. Lee

Well it is possible that he was incorrect IF he indeed
did lay the increase in ph to other than hydroquinone
reaction products. I've not given G. Haist a read on
that subject. I've only second and third hand of his
coverage and A&T are known to error.

The ph increase: Quote Ryuji Suzuki: "... a development
reaction product of hydroquinone reacting with sulfite
causing the ph to rise." Your becoming hotter; the
activity of the metol as well.

I've never read of a metol/sulfite combination where
ph rise was an issue but have read many times of the
hydroquinone/sulfite ph instability. Dan
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom