What types of B+W 220 film are available besides Tri-X?

$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 3
  • 122
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 151
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 2
  • 2
  • 143
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 6
  • 0
  • 111
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 8
  • 167

Forum statistics

Threads
198,801
Messages
2,781,078
Members
99,708
Latest member
sdharris
Recent bookmarks
1

Karl K

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
1,108
Location
NJ
Format
35mm
It seems that Ilford has stopped making 220 film. Any other ideas?
 

Dave Parker

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
4,031
Format
Multi Format
You might do a search using the advance search option, I know there has been many talks about 220 the last few months.

R.
 

Petzi

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
851
Location
Europe
Format
Med. Format Pan
Kodak Tri-X Professional 320 (TXP) is the only b/w film currently available in 220 format.
 

Brac

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
632
Location
UK
Format
35mm
Petzi said:
Kodak Tri-X Professional 320 (TXP) is the only b/w film currently available in 220 format.

Actually there is one other - Kodak make a C41 type B & W film & that's available in 220 size.
 

Chazzy

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
2,942
Location
South Bend,
Format
Multi Format
I wish we could get Forte or Foma to make 220, since Ilford is no longer interested in maintaining or replacing their 220 equipment. If the Eastern Europeans would only do so, I would stop using Ilford and standardize on an emulsion available in both 220 and sheet film.
 

Petzi

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2006
Messages
851
Location
Europe
Format
Med. Format Pan
The Kodak C-41 b/w film is discontinued in 220 format.
 

Dave Parker

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
4,031
Format
Multi Format
There is no longer a C41 B&W in 220, been discontinued due to lack of sales, I know alot ask for 220 but when you actually look at numbers of units being purchase, it is not economically feasable to continue to produce 220

R.
 

Brac

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
632
Location
UK
Format
35mm
Roxi331 said:
There is no longer a C41 B&W in 220, been discontinued due to lack of sales, I know alot ask for 220 but when you actually look at numbers of units being purchase, it is not economically feasable to continue to produce 220

R.
This must be very recent as Kodak Professional BW400CN which replaced the Portra version & the T400CN versions is still listed as available in 220 on Kodak's website viz: Dead Link Removed

It was only introduced early 2004 too.
 

Brac

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
632
Location
UK
Format
35mm
Chazzy said:
I wish we could get Forte or Foma to make 220, since Ilford is no longer interested in maintaining or replacing their 220 equipment. If the Eastern Europeans would only do so, I would stop using Ilford and standardize on an emulsion available in both 220 and sheet film.

It is apparently a matter of economincs, and if Ilford can't do it then the chances of much smaller concerns such as Forte or Foma (neither of whom ever made 220 film to my knowledge) making it is nil. Fuji at one time made their Neopan 400 in 220 and they still make lots of colour films in the size.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom