What to bring to a big city?

Aglow

D
Aglow

  • 0
  • 0
  • 18
Gilding the Lily Pads

H
Gilding the Lily Pads

  • 4
  • 2
  • 35
Aberthaw

A
Aberthaw

  • 9
  • 0
  • 78
A Taste of Autumn

H
A Taste of Autumn

  • Tel
  • Nov 10, 2025
  • 3
  • 0
  • 61
Feed

D
Feed

  • 4
  • 2
  • 53

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,571
Messages
2,810,238
Members
100,304
Latest member
Kurt01
Recent bookmarks
1

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,845
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
No matter where I am I’m always more concerned about negative human reactions by people who don’t like a stranger pointing a camera at them and taking unwanted pictures than robbers.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,623
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
In the general population, probably less than 1% would see the difference between a Leica M2 and an Olympus OM-1. In the areas your looking to explore, it's probably 1% of that 1%. They both look like old cameras.

On the other hand, 99% of the population would see the difference between an iPhone 14 and a Leica, and just about all these people would probably think the iPhone is the most expensive of the two.

We camera geeks might think that Leica vs OM-1 is like Lamborghini vs Toyota Corolla, but while there are many parts of big cities in which in would not park my Lamborghini—should I ever be able to afford one—, I wouldn't hesitate to take the Leica just about anywhere. The iPhone I hide more carefully, with the wallet.

I remember nearly getting mugged—never ran that fast in my life—at dawn in the old part of Genoa, Italy. They were not after the M2, couldn't care less. Just the wallet. Muggers don't have time to go around trying to pawn cameras—those that are usually come from home or store robberies. Muggers are after cash, bank and credit cards.

Most people use cell phones to take photographs and think that cameras have no value any longer.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,126
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
The meth heads don't know the difference between a Leica and a Canon and don't care. If you look or act like a chump they **might** bother to attempt to rob you.

Use whatever works best for you and just be alert to your surroundings, trust you gut, and you should be fine.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,623
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Mike Lopez

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
665
Format
Multi Format
Scary stuff. Recent stories out of Frisco recently give me the chills, and I lived in the South Bronx for seven years!

Calling it "Frisco" is the fastest way to announce to the world that "I am a tourist," thereby potentially drawing attention to yourself needlessly.

The next-fastest approach would be to spend all your time at Fisherman's Wharf and/or the Embarcadero.
 
OP
OP
SodaAnt

SodaAnt

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
429
Location
California
Format
Digital
Calling it "Frisco" is the fastest way to announce to the world that "I am a tourist," thereby potentially drawing attention to yourself needlessly.

The next-fastest approach would be to spend all your time at Fisherman's Wharf and/or the Embarcadero.

Actually, I know the city fairly well and wouldn’t bother to spend time at the Fisherman’s Wharf or the Embarcadero tourist traps.

I haven’t been over there since the pandemic started and was curious as to whether all the stuff I’ve been hearing on the news is accurate. Guess I’ll just have to go there myself and check it out.

A longtime friend, a native of SF, calls it Frisco, and I suppose I’ve picked up the habit.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
959
Location
L.A. - NYC - Rustbelt
Format
Multi Format
Calling it "Frisco" is the fastest way to announce to the world that "I am a tourist," thereby potentially drawing attention to yourself needlessly.

The next-fastest approach would be to spend all your time at Fisherman's Wharf and/or the Embarcadero.

Always call it Frisco. It has been called Frisco forever. And if nothing else it irritates the virtue signalers.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,273
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
It’s been some years since I lived there, but no one who lived there called it “Frisco,” ever. Just ask the ghost of Herb Caen (some old timer natives will get that reference).
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
SodaAnt

SodaAnt

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
429
Location
California
Format
Digital
Then you don’t know my friend Jack. He’s lived there all his life and always calls it Frisco. I think he does it to tweak the Johnny-come-latelies.
 

baachitraka

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
3,621
Location
Bremen, Germany.
Format
Multi Format
good shoes, plenty of water to drink...

- 28mm lens + camera + couple of rolls
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,126
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
Calling the city 'Frisco' doesn't bother/annoy/irritate anybody, it just causes confusion (Frisco is in Texas) and makes you look like a fool.
 
Last edited:

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,623
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Actually, I know the city fairly well and wouldn’t bother to spend time at the Fisherman’s Wharf or the Embarcadero tourist traps.

I haven’t been over there since the pandemic started and was curious as to whether all the stuff I’ve been hearing on the news is accurate. Guess I’ll just have to go there myself and check it out.

A longtime friend, a native of SF, calls it Frisco, and I suppose I’ve picked up the habit.

Skip Union Square because all the stores are closed.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,273
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
On that topic, this is a fun read!


Good one, and pretty accurate.

Perhaps more on topic, just get a feel for whatever neighborhood you’re visiting. You should pick up on the vibe. I was at a 50 year reunion at my old high school on Ocean Ave, walking around and finding a place to eat on Mission it didn’t feel much different from the old days. 20 years ago I was at a conference and the hotel was on the borderline of the Tenderloin- no way was I walking though that neighborhood, even then.
I live in LA (city of) now. There are areas I know I shouldn’t be in, especially after dark. But for the most part I feel comfortable and wouldn’t hesitate to be out making photos.
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,805
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format
For street photography in big cities, particularly out of the tourist areas, is it okay to bring bling cameras like Leicas, or is it better to bring beaters, like an old OM-1? I don’t want to lose something expensive to a junkie looking for his next score.


I used to (legally) carry a concealed weapon for worst case scenario insurance. For many years, I had no problems and people would walk up curious to see through the back of a view camera or ask about the Hasselblad.
No more. It's no longer safe even if armed.

Now I just avoid the big cities - LA, San Fran, Chicago, New York and their ilk are in chaos and freefall. The "reporting" on what's going on in these hellholes is dishonest and gives one the impression that crime isn't a serious problem. That is a lie.

Chicago is a good example. The crime rate was actually higher in the 1990s. What they are not telling anyone is that - while the rate is lower today - it has spread across the entire city like a cancer. Quiet, well mannered neighborhoods are experiencing violent thuggery in the form of carjacking, violent assault, and theft of all kinds. What used to be a problem localized to poor, drug trafficking areas, is now an epidemic across the city.

I have worked in- and near most of the big cities in the US. Unless there is a serious change in social and political policy, they are all going to become Detroit or worse.

I treasure the pictures I took in these places, because I will never again go there to take a picture or enjoy a fine restaurant.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,623
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I used to (legally) carry a concealed weapon for worst case scenario insurance. For many years, I had no problems and people would walk up curious to see through the back of a view camera or ask about the Hasselblad.
No more. It's no longer safe even if armed.

Now I just avoid the big cities - LA, San Fran, Chicago, New York and their ilk are in chaos and freefall. The "reporting" on what's going on in these hellholes is dishonest and gives one the impression that crime isn't a serious problem. That is a lie.

Chicago is a good example. The crime rate was actually higher in the 1990s. What they are not telling anyone is that - while the rate is lower today - it has spread across the entire city like a cancer. Quiet, well mannered neighborhoods are experiencing violent thuggery in the form of carjacking, violent assault, and theft of all kinds. What used to be a problem localized to poor, drug trafficking areas, is now an epidemic across the city.

I have worked in- and near most of the big cities in the US. Unless there is a serious change in social and political policy, they are all going to become Detroit or worse.

I treasure the pictures I took in these places, because I will never again go there to take a picture or enjoy a fine restaurant.

I do not have your fears. Instead I just use common sense to guide me.
 

Alex Benjamin

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
2,795
Location
Montreal
Format
Multi Format
I do not have your fears. Instead I just use common sense to guide me.

Same.

Opinions, especially nourished by prejudice and fear, are irrelevant. Stats don't lie.

Capture d’écran, le 2023-08-29 à 12.02.56.png


I feel much safer in New York City today than I did in the mid-80s.

And, at the risk of repeating myself: poverty and homelessness is not synonyme of criminality.
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,805
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format
Same.

Opinions, especially nourished by prejudice and fear, are irrelevant. Stats don't lie.

View attachment 347747

I feel much safer in New York City today than I did in the mid-80s.

And, at the risk of repeating myself: poverty and homelessness is not synonyme of criminality.

Stats don't lie but context matters. I lived in- or near Chicago for many years. The total crime rate was considerably higher in the 1990s. But this misses two very important points of context:

1. Where crime is happening. It used to be localized and could be avoided fairly predictably. Now it's ubiquitous across the city. I routinely walked downtown at night by myself without any concern in the 1990s. I wouldn't do that today for any reason.

2. Dishonest reporting. {policy remarks edited out}

Poverty and homelessness are absolutely vectors for crime. We may decry that they exist, but to pretend otherwise is to not observe the obvious. There isn't a lot of crime in Nantucket, Chicago's North Shore, or Napa Valley, for example.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,805
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format

As I've not lived there in some years, I haven't been keeping up with the Chicago daily mayhem report but I did 3 seconds of searching and found this. What is noteworthy is that the murders here are not all in the "poverty and homeless" areas - they are city wide. It's tragic. Chicago used to be a crown jewel of the US:

 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,255
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
One advantage I do have that most don’t is size: 6’5” 250 lbs.
A few times in the late 70s I would drive into the City -- Frisco, San Fran, The Bay (or Gray, or Gay) Area, and so forth -- in the early morning hours (3-ish), park and walk around the city and watch it wake up. I was a little smaller -- 6'4", 220 lb...and could run long and hard if needed. However, as light hit the city and people emerged, it seemed to be that I was who the people would be avoiding! So it goes. I'd hit City Lights and wander about...just another longhair hippy in the City of Love.

The last time I wandered around there with a camera I was also pushing a stroller with three 2 year old boys in it (1999). Photo below -- a 20 yr old print, the RA4 chemicals were probably on their last legs, but a fun image.

Most dangerous thing to happen to me in SF was going to a free dinner and ending up at a Moonie farm for three days.

I suggest using a TLR -- few will know it is a camera....
 

Attachments

  • SF copy.jpg
    SF copy.jpg
    888.3 KB · Views: 107
Last edited:

Arthurwg

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,806
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format
The only person I knew who was robbed of his camera was an American tourist in France. Contax 645.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom