Nikon 2
Member
Not if you want to be able to focus at infinity. For macro work, yes.
The only alternative is the Voightlander lenses made for the Nikon F cameras?
Are they as good as the Leica lenses…?
How will you define or characterize "as good as" Leica lenses? Is there an issue with Nikkor lenses?
There are three series of modern Zeiss SLR lenses offered in Nikon F mount - what they call ZF mount - the classic, Milvus and Otus series. The Milvus and Otus series are still current:
https://www.zeiss.com/consumer-products/us/photography/milvus
https://www.zeiss.com/consumer-products/us/photography/otus
Not necessarily a valid assumption. The laws of optics are the same , no matter who makes the lens. Ask yourself which company has a bigger R&D budget?while Leica lenses can cost many times more than the equivalent Nikkor lens one suspects, including myself, that they must be sharper with less distortion …!
Not necessarily a valid assumption. The laws of optics are the same , no matter who makes the lens. Ask yourself which company has a bigger R&D budget?
The Nikon F mount has a film-to-flange distance of 46.5mm. In order to focus to infinity on a Nikon F camera, the adapted lens needs a film-to-flange distance that is greater than 46.5mm, plus some thickness for the adapter, so that its film-to-flange distance can be maintained. There are very few 35mm film camera lenses that meet that requirement (see https://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~westin/misc/mounts-by-register.html for a chart listing film-to-flange distances). Probably the most common lenses that will work are T2 mount lenses, many of which will have lower image quality than Nikkor lenses, but YMMV.
I have Zeiss Olympic Sonnars in two focal lengths with adapters for Nikon which replace Zeiss mount. However, both are very heavy chunks of glass and brass. I also have the Nikon version (Nikon tweaked lens from 2.8 to 2.5).
Many early lenses for Nikon were Zeiss patents acquired by Nikon after war. This does not ignore Nikon’s impressive lens development. Also, Zeiss and Nikon’s original company had prewar business relationships.
I use both Nikon and Leica cameras because each has its own advantages, but not because of lenses.
Do you see any perceptible difference, sharpness or distortion, between the lenses …?
Very good links, thanks…!^^What he said^^
Couple good links here.Alternative Gear & Lenses - Photography - FM Forums
Explore Alternative Gear & Lenses photography discussions. Share your photos, discuss gear and techniques, and buy or sell equipment in our marketplace.www.fredmiranda.com
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |