• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

What other cameras should I be trying

michr said:
I'd like to see what you think of Argus rangefinders, the c3, c33, c4 or c44, with other than the stock 50mm lenses attached. Also what do you think of the Kodak Signet series?
Click to expand...

Hey Michr - I would like to have a play around with an Argus C3 or similar - they're not as common here in the Uk as they are in the US.

Not shot with a Signet at all - worth a crack?

S
 

Quite a list there - and nothing so far on the list, though I've been keeping my eye on Mamiya Six prices. I met a Swedish photographer once who had taken some amazing pics with one.
 

Not quite enough in the fund for a Nikon SP, unless I win the Lottery...

S
 
mweintraub said:
I've thought about getting Russian / Ukraine Nikon mount lens to play with. If it's good wide open (not "cloudy") then I'd be happy with it. OT: My new Nikkor-H 50mm f2 has that haze/cloudiness wide open, but is sharp @ f/2.8.
Click to expand...


This is a good shot of the Helios 81N wide open on my F2A and Superia 200:



Another one:



Unfortunately no swirly bokeh, but light years improvement from a Nikkor 50mm f2 IMO.
 
Some of the early compact AF point and shoot cameras, like the Konica C35AF, Minolta Hi-Matic AF or AF2, Nikon L35AF, and Canon AF35M or AF35ML.
 
One of the best camera to use is Contax RF and their various copies. I have an excellent Kiev IV of the Seventies, it is really quiet, cheap, precise focusing, good optical quality, little.
 
Zorkiphoto said:
Quite a list there - and nothing so far on the list, though I've been keeping my eye on Mamiya Six prices. I met a Swedish photographer once who had taken some amazing pics with one.
Click to expand...

I have a Mamiya 6, got about 25 years ago, now needs need seals, with a lens shade one of the best MF lens I have ever used. At the 25 pound point the Topcon 100 or Uni or a working Kowa STR would be fun. As I understand it many of Kowa lens were designed by Fritz Hintz at Kailfit including the Kowa 50 F 1.9 and 1.8. A Topcon D or SuperD will likely be over your budget.
 
I've owned a Signet 35 (non functioning shutter, which I hear is common) and a Signet 80. Both cameras have coupled rangefinders. From what I hear the 35 has a great lens, and the styling of the camera is unique. It's also built like a tank, with an all-metal body, allegedly designed for military use and for use with gloves. The 80 is the only one in the series with interchangeable lenses. The entire body is made out of bakelite, the film is just spooled an area on the left side of the camera without a takeup reel. Three focal lengths were made, and changing lenses is very simple. Kodak also made the 30, 40, and 50, similarly styled non-interchangeable, non-rangefinder cameras.

I think they're worth a try.
 
Zorkiphoto, it looked like your link to the Lomo LC-A review is broken on your web site?

How's about reviews for:

Zorki/Zorki C SLRs
Fujica Mini
Lomo LCA-120
 

Wow - thanks Flavio - that is quite the list...

There's a few I've already reviewed..

Dead Link Removed
Dead Link Removed

My main SLR outfit is four ESIIs and a bunch of SMC Takumars - great cameras, and really nice for travelling.

I've been blown away by the quality of the Olympus 35RC - I'm taking it on a few upcoming trips to Istanbul and Seville... it's a brilliant little camera.

I've also got a Minolta XE-1 that I'll review at some point in the next year... a beautiful piece of kit.

Lots else to discover - thanks for so many suggestions.

S
 
blockend said:
SLRs of a given decade and price point are all much of a muchness, with very few exceptions. Folders, box cameras, up market Instamatics, Werra, Mamiya Press, TLRs and AF zoom compacts are under represented in tests.
Click to expand...

Good point, worth bearing in mind when looking for possibles.

I am shooting a lot with a Lubitel TLR at the moment. It's enjoyable.
 
Zorkiphoto said:
I've also got a Minolta XE-1 that I'll review at some point in the next year... a beautiful piece of kit.

Lots else to discover - thanks for so many suggestions.

S
Click to expand...

The XE/XE-7 bodies are great. I had one and it was just a pleasure to use. The winding is the smoothest I've used. (never used a Leica, so that's probably on par). Probably another reason Leica used the XE for their R3.

I sold mine because of the jumpy meter. Kinda wish I kept it and fixed it.
 

Hi Sceptic

I used to have a P6 but found my Kiev 60 way more useable thanks to more of the frame in shot.

I do however still have the 50/4. 80/2.8 and 120/2.8 lenses, all of which are fantastic.

S
 
Minolta X700, and other MC/MD cameras. I have a Minolta Maxxum 9xi that I have been having fun with.
 
A lot of the "must review" cameras have been reviewed countless times on the internet and one more won't be that useful. I would select from the suggestions those cameras for which there is less attention.

A good example is the Canon EF ("the Black Beauty") of 1973-1978. Aside from a Wikipedia entry, I haven't found a single review of this camera - not even on MIR.
 
After some thought Olympus IS , range of bridge camera, Olympus made many models, I see the basic 35 to 135mm going for as little as $2.00 on line. The zooms are APO, some with ED glass, macro, all seem to have M, S, A, and P exposure mode. I have my eye a 25 to 100.
 

Thanks PDH...funnily enough, I've been looking at a Kowa leaf shutter SLR... I got a KOwa E a few years back with the meter was massively underexposing.

I'll keep an eye out for the Petris aswell.

Cheers

S
 

I have a Kiev 19M wwith an erratic meter - it's worth keeping just for the Arsat. I've got some beautiful shots with it.
 

Cheers Kyle - consider the FTb on the shopping list.

S
 
Quirky American answers to expensive German 35mm cameras just before and after WWII were the Mercury and Mercury II half-frame models. The design was largely original. The rotary focal plane shutter was simple, reliable, and more accurate than shutters in Zeiss and Leitz products. Unfortunately, the range was only from 1/20 to 1/1000 and B, except for one model that went up to 1/1500. The Mercury featured the World's first hot shoe flash. The cameras had interchangeable lens ability, although focal lengths other than the original 35mm are rare. The die-cast body was sturdy and fairly heavy. The pre-war Mercury used proprietary film, and cannot be used with today's film. No rangefinder was included, as that would have increased the cost and greatly increased the bulk due to the rotary shutter housing. I used one in the early 1950s, and found it to be reliable. The f/2.7 triplet lens was comparable to that in the Argus C3 and other cameras in that class.
 
Zorkiphoto said:
Thanks PDH...funnily enough, I've been looking at a Kowa leaf shutter SLR... I got a KOwa E a few years back with the meter was massively underexposing.

I'll keep an eye out for the Petris aswell.

Cheers

S
Click to expand...

Petri is an interesting camera, the lens seem sharp enough, the Peri 135 3.5 is listed on few sites as one of the shaprist, I have an FT and EE, in breach mount. I have the 55 1.9, a 135 2.8 a 200 and a 70 to 230 zoom, contrast is somewhat low, I took the bottom cover off the FT, shutter is run by a set of tension springs. Perti moved to a M42 mount just before going out of business, or at least the camera business, some sites indicate that Petri made telescopes for a few years. I don't know if the brand was sold and used to market other cameras.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register