• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

What Medium Format Cameras Are Members Here Using?

Ecstatic Roundabout

A
Ecstatic Roundabout

  • 0
  • 0
  • 50
MIT. 25:35

MIT. 25:35

  • 1
  • 0
  • 87

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,960
Messages
2,848,133
Members
101,555
Latest member
drzf
Recent bookmarks
0
So we are into lists again, are we?? Okay, why not, it's Sunday and I'm at home scanning old 120 negatives...

Current lot of MF -

One Rolleiflex 3.5E2, 75/3.5 Zeiss Planar. Bought new (well, as a demo) in 1966. Serviced two times. Still used a few times a year. Taking lens has spa of separation, it looks like a small egg,but it doesn't seem to affect my images.

Two Rolleiflex Ts, black bodies, bought as new in the 1990s.Zeiss Tessars. Serviced one time each The shutters are a little unreliable, but I've figured out a workaround to get them to operate, so I would say 95% reliable. Used regularly (I'll go on using them until my stocks of 120 film run out, then it's off to the cabinet shelf they'll go), entirely with 16 exposure kits. A heap of accessories.

One Rolleicord Vb, bought in 2019 from a deceased estate. A wonderful camera. The Xenar lens has a remarkable 'look'. Also used with a 16 exposure kit, I have a 24 kit but have used it only one time. The Rolleiflex T accessories fit this camera, so it's a good user.


0ne Zeiss Nettar with the nice direct ('albada') finder, from about 1950. Synchro-Compur shutter, Novar lens. Good to carry in a pocket when I want to go lightly.

One Voigtlander Perkeo I with the legendary Color Skopar lens. I don't use this babe as much as I should, but I will this (Australian) autumn is here early this year and it's cooler to go on day trips and bush walks.

The list of MF cameras I used to have is much longer. Yeshiva TLRs in the 1960s, a Linhof Technika kit in the '80s, a Bronica 6x6 in the '90s. Too many Hasseblads, the best two were a 501CM and a 500CM. The Els I'm still trying to forget. Several lenses, all early ones, contrasty and good but servicing cost too much. Unloaded the lot in 2012-2015. Lost a little money, of course. No regrets.

If I had kept $100 or even $50 from every other MF camera I've bought and sold in my time, I would be a rich man. But who learns these things until it's all done with??
 
Rolleiflex 2.8C
MPP Microflex
Rolleiflex 6008 Integral
Agfa Super Isolette
DeMaria LaPierre Telka III
Pentax K-3 III (oops)
Voigtländer Superb (Heliar) on its way
 
[QUOTE="ozmoose, post: 2528994, member:
If I had kept $100 or even $50 from every other MF camera I've bought and sold in my time, I would be a rich man. But who learns these things until it's all done with??[/QUOTE]

Me too on this. Or in my case I think if I had kept "xyz" camera that I had years ago think of all the money I would have saved.
Oh well,
Robert
 
Broke hobbist photographer here...
I can afford a Pentacon Six and a Yashica Mat 124 G.
It seems they do their job and that's all that I require.
 
Broke hobbist photographer here...
I can afford a Pentacon Six and a Yashica Mat 124 G.
It seems they do their job and that's all that I require.











Welcome to APUG Photrio!!
 
I can afford a Pentacon Six and a Yashica Mat 124 G.

That's doing pretty well. Most of the time since I came back to photography (early 2000s), I haven't been able to afford either of those. Pesky stuff like rent, utilities, and car payments kept getting in the way.
 
Rollieflex T (overhauled by Harry Fleenor) w Maxwell screen
Plaubel Makina 670
 
I have only one, a Zeiss-Ikon Ikonta 6 × 9.

Yashica MAT 124-G with Aux tele and wide angle lenses.

...I can afford a Pentacon Six and a Yashica Mat 124 G.It seems they do their job and that's all that I require.

... I haven't been able to afford either of those. Pesky stuff like rent, utilities, and car payments kept getting in the way.

Rollieflex T (overhauled by Harry Fleenor) w Maxwell screen
Plaubel Makina 670

Hm. So much common sense on one page is almost more than I can handle...

Minimalism is the way, all the way. Kudos to all!!
 
Last edited:
I just got into shooting medium format film, and so I've just got the one...an original Mamiya M645 with three lenses: 35/3.5, 80/2.8 and 150/3.5. Got a major deal on the body, paying only $150 for it, and it's in perfect working order.

mamiya_kit.jpg
 
I just got into shooting medium format film, and so I've just got the one...an original Mamiya M645 with three lenses: 35/3.5, 80/2.8 and 150/3.5. Got a major deal on the body, paying only $150 for it, and it's in perfect working order.

mamiya_kit.jpg

Great kit. Congratz on deal.
 
Just got my hands on a 127mm lens for Mamiya RB67. Had the body and back for a long time but never used. Running a roll right. Lets see if I like 6x7. Camera is bulky but don't have any problem with that.
 
Just got my hands on a 127mm lens for Mamiya RB67. Had the body and back for a long time but never used. Running a roll right. Lets see if I like 6x7. Camera is bulky but don't have any problem with that.

Do you like that focal length? I never liked my 127/3.8; i only liked the compact size.
 
I just got into shooting medium format film, and so I've just got the one...an original Mamiya M645 with three lenses: 35/3.5,

Wow, i didn't know such a lens existed. It's giving me a bit of envy. On the Bronica ETR we only have the 40/4 wideangles (which OTOH are very good -- and front element is only 62mm) and the 30mm fisheye, which is really really expensive.
 
I just got into shooting medium format film, and so I've just got the one...an original Mamiya M645 with three lenses: 35/3.5, 80/2.8 and 150/3.5. Got a major deal on the body, paying only $150 for it, and it's in perfect working order.

mamiya_kit.jpg

Enjoy! Now go out and take photographs!
 
Do you like that focal length? I never liked my 127/3.8; i only liked the compact size.

Not sure yet :laugh:. Haven't finished the roll. So far no issues with handling and focusing, although a bit slow. Most of my medium format lens are 2.8 so used to that aperture. I guess I will know once I process the roll.
 
Not sure yet :laugh:. Haven't finished the roll. So far no issues with handling and focusing, although a bit slow. Most of my medium format lens are 2.8 so used to that aperture. I guess I will know once I process the roll.

Check out the elements for haze. That lens tends to suffer from haze developed within the lens groups. (There are 3 lens groups, two of them are cemented, and they can get hazy.)
 
Check out the elements for haze. That lens tends to suffer from haze developed within the lens groups. (There are 3 lens groups, two of them are cemented, and they can get hazy.)

Thanks. Seems lens is ok. Lens conditions is what attracted me. It is in a great shape and glass seems to be haze/fungus/scratch free.

Since I mostly shoot 6x6 and 6x9 was in no hurry to try 6x7 but this lens came out on the bay and couldn't resist :laugh:
 
Thanks. Seems lens is ok. Lens conditions is what attracted me. It is in a great shape and glass seems to be haze/fungus/scratch free.

Since I mostly shoot 6x6 and 6x9 was in no hurry to try 6x7 but this lens came out on the bay and couldn't resist :laugh:

That's great! This should be one of the best performing lenses for the RB system. It uses the same optical structure than the Mamiya-Sekor 80/2.8 lens for the TLR cameras, which has a very good reputation.
 
Enjoy! Now go out and take photographs!

I have indeed....I've posted several shots from my first few rolls through the camera. While I will still shoot digital for the majority of my work, I really do enjoy the film process to change things up.
 
Wow, i didn't know such a lens existed. It's giving me a bit of envy. On the Bronica ETR we only have the 40/4 wideangles (which OTOH are very good -- and front element is only 62mm) and the 30mm fisheye, which is really really expensive.

Yeah, I've always enjoyed wide-angle shooting, and the 35/3.5 gives an angle of view that I particularly like. The lens is only OK..definitely one of the weaker optics of the Mamiya 645 system, but that's par for the course given the age of the lens. It's sharp in the middle and ok at the edges, but definitely notably softer at the edges and corners than in the center. The lens has a lot of field curvature, so if you shoot subjects that have close objects at the edges that move to distant towards the middle, it plays to the lens's strengths and it can show good sharpness to the edges. It also has a good bit of moustache-type complex distortion. Since I process in a hybrid manner (I develop the negatives at home, then scan with my R5 and a macro lens over a light table and do minor adjustments and print digitally), I can correct the distortion mostly in post.

A few quick samples:

Tri-X 400:
columbus_arch.jpg


Gold 200:
music_soul.jpg



Pan F Plus 50:
mamiya_doorway.jpg


supreme_fish_leveque.jpg


Gold 200:

graffiti_door.jpg
 
Last edited:
I forgot to add:










Welcome to APUG Photrio!!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom