What lens for OM bellows?

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 56
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 52
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 45
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 52

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,903
Messages
2,782,796
Members
99,743
Latest member
HypnoRospo
Recent bookmarks
0

John51

Member
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
797
Format
35mm
Bellows and slide copier attachment has just arrived. Gives me an excuse for a bit more GAS. :smile:

Which OM bellows lens should I be looking out for? Ideally, I'd like one that is good for slide copying as well as other macro work.
 

cooltouch

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
1,677
Location
Houston, Tex
Format
Multi Format
Back in the day I had a Canon Auto Bellows with the slide copier attachment. I found that the 50mm f/3.5 macro, when used with the bellows, gave me just the magnification I needed for 1:1 slide dupes. Anything longer and you'll have crops of your slides.

A bellows is a bellows is a bellows. Doesn't really matter the brand. The collapsed and max extension measurements will be close to agreement from one brand to the next. So what worked for my Canon setup will likely work just as well for your Oly setup. So my recommendation is for you to find an Oly 50mm macro, which is not a bellows-specific lens.
 

EdSawyer

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
1,793
Format
Multi Format
The "right" lens for slide copying with that setup, and also a good macro lens is the OM 80/4 auto macro. I think I have a spare one, I will check. The 20, 38, 50, and 135/4.5 are all good choices too, depending on magnification. I had a huge pile of the OM macro system for a while but have been slowly parting with it as I just don't use it enough to justify.
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,452
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
Olympus made some lenses for exclusive use on the bellows, the 20mm f/2 and the 38mm f/2.8 and 80mm f/4 and 135mm f/4.5 The magnification ranges from these lenses...
  • 20mm 4.2X-16X
  • 38mm 1.7X-8X
  • 80mm 0.5X-2X
  • 135mm 0.2X-0.5X

so the 80mm seems most appropriate for 1X copy work. Olympus even says,
"When a regular standard lenses are used with a bellows for close-up photography, image quality deteriorates steadily. Even the 50mm macro lens starts gettin gout of its depth at magnifications over one half life size."​
 

thuggins

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
1,144
Location
Dallas, TX
Format
Multi Format
Olympus made seven lenses for use with the bellows; 20f2, 20f3.5, 38f2.8, 38f3.5, 80f4 (manual and auto), and 135f4.5. Their recommendation for 1 to 1 work was the 80f4.

The problem with these lenses is that they are of little use apart from the bellows. They have a very limited focus range and several don't even have a helicoid, so all the focusing must be done with the bellows. While a 50mm or 90mm macro may not have all the image quality of the 80mm when used with a bellows or extension tubes, these are all around excellent lenses that you'll get a lot more use out of.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
Olympus made some lenses for exclusive use on the bellows, the 20mm f/2 and the 38mm f/2.8 and 80mm f/4 and 135mm f/4.5 The magnification ranges from these lenses...
  • 20mm 4.2X-16X
  • 38mm 1.7X-8X
  • 80mm 0.5X-2X
  • 135mm 0.2X-0.5X

Do you know how these magnifications are achieved - whether or not the lenses have to be mounted in reverse?
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,452
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
Do you know how these magnifications are achieved - whether or not the lenses have to be mounted in reverse?

Designed simply to be used in a 'conventional' orientation, not necessary to reverse on the bellows. In fact, in some cases (the 80mm and the 135mm) the lens has a signficantly large diameter protrusion behind the mount location of the lens, which projects back into the bellows and which prevents use mounted on the OM body directly.
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
Designed simply to be used in a 'conventional' orientation, not necessary to reverse on the bellows. In fact, in some cases (the 80mm and the 135mm) the lens has a signficantly large diameter protrusion behind the mount location of the lens, which projects back into the bellows and which prevents use mounted on the OM body directly.
That is a very good advantage as I believe I cannot attain 16X magnification even with my normal 20mm reversed. Do you have examples with such magnifications from that combination?
 

ph

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
157
Location
Norway
Format
35mm
The OMbellows not only has a bellow between the camera body and the lens, but also between the front of the lens and the slide\negative mounting device\\ your target. This eliminates stray light but does favour OM lenses. The bellows also had a socket for the double-stranded cable release so that you did not have to stop down manually. The camera side of the bellows has an interchangeable mount, so one does not suffer the added extension of an OM to whatever adapter.

I have only kept the 135bellows lens which can also be used on the variable extension helix so as to mount on a camera (OM1-4 or ith adapter on digitals) and focus to infinity.

Nowadays I only use the bellows for digitizing the occasional slide and have pressed an old enlarger lens into service (Rodenstock Apo-Ronar 50mm). It needs a step-up ring in order for the front bellows to fit which hampers the aperture ring, so I use it at fixed aperture.

p.
 

BAC1967

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
1,434
Location
Bothell, WA
Format
Medium Format
I don't have any of the lenses that were made for use with the bellows so I just use the 50mm and 100mm prime lenses depending on what maximum magnification I'm trying to get.

Below was shot with an Olympus OM-1 with Extension Bellows and E. Zuiko Auto-T f/2.8 100mm lens. Cinestill 800T film.

Shutter Macro by Bryan Chernick, on Flickr
 
OP
OP

John51

Member
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
797
Format
35mm
Thanks for the replies. I'm going to have some fun with this kit. Have just found the 2nd bellows in the slide copier like ph said.
 
OP
OP

John51

Member
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
797
Format
35mm
I learned of the close up attachment for the 80mm Auto Macro when used with the Auto extension tubes. Any use if using a bellows or not to bother?
 

Algo después

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2020
Messages
241
Location
Ecuador- Argentina
Format
Multi Format
...regarding this thread, recently I got an OM system with several extras (autobellows, 3 flashes, a varimagni finder, a 50mm macro, a 2x teleconverter, some filters, etc.) and I was wondering what if you would adapt those cheap microscope lens such as Amscope 4x in a film camera. Guess it´s just a matter of printing an adapter to connect to the autobellows because you need 160mm at least of distance between the camera and the lens (if you need 4x of magnification) and obviously a ton of strobes. Certainly you can´t use the cable release here nevertheless I think this is not a big deal, is it?

Anyway this lens seems like a nice option (17 bucks) because the zuiko 20mm is a hole in your pocket nowadays. So, does anybody have tried this before?


 
Last edited:

Algo después

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2020
Messages
241
Location
Ecuador- Argentina
Format
Multi Format
...regarding this thread, recently I got an OM system with several extras (autobellows, 3 flashes, a varimagni finder, a 50mm macro, a 2x teleconverter, some filters, etc.) and I was wondering what if you would adapt those cheap microscope lens such as Amscope 4x in a film camera. Guess it´s just a matter of printing an adapter to connect to the autobellows because you need 160mm at least of distance between the camera and the lens (if you need 4x of magnification) and obviously a ton of strobes. Certainly you can´t use the cable release here nevertheless I think this is not a big deal, is it?

Anyway this is lens is a nice option (17 bucks) because the zuiko 20mm is a hole in your pocket nowadays. So, does anybody have tried this before?

a quick reply to myself (I hope this would be it´s useful for somebody else) :


Given that the maxim magnifications just were possible with certain autobellows´s lenses (for instance, the first versions of manual zuiko 20mm/ 38mm) those are useless if you don´t get the Mount PM-MTob to convert it to the OM bayonet fitting. So in the case that I would decide to get a 300-700 bucks lens I was looking out there for this adapter and I hadn`t too much luck.


Nonetheless I figured out that someone is selling a similar item on Ebay, I mean, one side as RMS mount and the other side as OM mount, so I will try to get this.


s-l1600.jpg



On the other hand, the first version of those lenses were manual so the settings didn´t required the double cable release. In that way, if it works, you can get a 4x setting for less than 60 bucks.
 
Last edited:

xkaes

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 25, 2006
Messages
4,791
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
You can get RMS to L39 adapter for about $10-20, and a L39 to ANYTHING adapter for even less. Pretty cheap. Save you $$$ for the lens.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom