Hi Everyone, mine is not all that old: a 1949 Leica IIIC, just overhauled by Don Goldberg in Wisconsin. My dad bought this camera new when he worked on Guam. The Summitar lens has feet on the focus scale, so it was intended for the USA market.
Hey, that looks like mine, with the exception of that interesting cone of shame around the shutter button.
Here's my newest oldest functional camera:
View attachment 193427
It's a Kodak Browne 2A model B. It takes 116 film. I need to figure out how to adapt it to take 120 since 116 is no longer made.
I got it from my parents as a Christmas present since they know how much I like old cameras...

Either my Kodak Brownie 2E, or Kodak Pocket 1. Both probably date from circa 1920
Oldest in regular use is a Zeiss-Ikon 520/16 from the mid/late 1930s.
I stand corrected: It turns out her camera is a #2, not a 1a. It also turns out that I have (and forgot about) another distant relative's Kodak #2a, which I've never used because it takes 116 film. They're both about 100 years old and I just checked them out a few minutes ago - no light leaks in the bellows, shutters fire, apertures work smoothly. So I guess it's a tie; they're both about the same age and they both work.My great grandmother’s Kodak #1a Autographic Jr. from about 100 years ago still works fine, although I seldom use it.
... Kodak #2a, which I've never used because it takes 116 film.
...
Kodak Folding Pocket (pre-)No.0 from 1898.
120 spools are a bit of a tight fit, but they work in it.
?Oh, I’m sure it would. Truth is these cameras are a bit of a chore to use so I only ever bothered with the #2 as it already takes 120 film. I’m not sure how much I’d really be gaining by getting the #2a to use 120 as the two cameras are pretty comparable.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
