Yeah, and what's strange is the damage is all cosmetic, dents and brassing, etc. All functions are perfect and the camera's very clean inside. No signs of interior corrosion, dirt or other abuse. The aperture stop-down lever has a lot of wear, so it appears to have taken a lot of photos.oh my gosh; never seen suc an abused camera. I always treat mine like ladies.
From what I've heard the best techs of the old days blow most of our modern guys out if the water. I talked to several when I was trying to get a broken OM-2 fixed.Yeah, and what's strange is the damage is all cosmetic, dents and brassing, etc. All functions are perfect and the camera's very clean inside. No signs of interior corrosion, dirt or other abuse. The aperture stop-down lever has a lot of wear, so it appears to have taken a lot of photos.
I'd like to think this F2 was carried around the world and used hard by a working photojournalist, then sent in for professional service every six months.
Yeah, and what's strange is the damage is all cosmetic, dents and brassing, etc. All functions are perfect and the camera's very clean inside. No signs of interior corrosion, dirt or other abuse. The aperture stop-down lever has a lot of wear, so it appears to have taken a lot of photos.
I'd like to think this F2 was carried around the world and used hard by a working photojournalist, then sent in for professional service every six months.
From what I've heard the best techs of the old days blow most of our modern guys out if the water. I talked to several when I was trying to get a broken OM-2 fixed.
One guy in particular who came very recommended told me some fishy stuff--he advertised CLA's, but it became clear from his emails that his CLA was extremely minimal and did not involve enough disassembly to clean, lubricate and adjust the interior of most shutters. And he charges more for his "CLA" than Mike Trost does for actual remedial services, on the order of 140 US dollars, iirc!
Compare this to the old technicians working during the mid film era, and a lot of modern techs are a joke!
Hold my beer, bitte!!! (Not sure if that expression is used in Germany!)oh my gosh; never seen suc an abused camera. I always treat mine like ladies.
I'd have to second the F2 for all the points mentioned already.
Although I have to think the toughest Nikon F was the one that stopped a sniper's bullet from killing Don McCullin.
Ah, a very nice looking camera. I've never seen one in person. Is the body casting similar to that of the F-series Nikkormats? I know it corresponds to the body casting of the later Nikon rangefinders.
Although some of the early Zenits were probably pretty resilient too. I'd put my money on my Zenit S surviving a lot if it didn't get moisture inside.
One thing about all these old cameras, they didn't need a frigging *#*#!! Firmware update!
Mine either. Digital is great but I hate sitting in front of a computer.My Hasselblad 503 CW and 903 SWC don't need no stinkin' firmware updates! Nor my Pacemaker Speed Graphic nor the Graflex Model D!
This is probably the biggest reason I am back to film. Computer = Work (like my job), for me. On the other hand, Film = Fun....I hate sitting in front of a computer.
This is probably the biggest reason I am back to film. Computer = Work (like my job), for me. On the other hand, Film = Fun.
And yet, here we are!+1, I spend all day in front of a computer. The last thing I feel like doing in my leisure time is more of that. ..
That's true, I guess I'm fooling myselfAnd yet, here we are!
Good point! I catch the forum on my tablet, so it's not the same for me. Though I am getting tired of the tablet, too...And yet, here we are!
And yet, here we are!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?